Latin American Countries Stuck in the Field of Development Theory: A Case Study of Chile

Jiaqi Yang

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v2n2.35

Authors

Jiaqi Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v2n2.35

Keywords:

Neoliberalism, Evelopment Theories, Hile, Washington Consensus, Economic Growth, Social Welfare, Income Inequality, Latin America, Socio-Economic Impact, Public Demonstrations

Abstract

This manuscript conducts a nuanced exploration of the ramifications associated with the adoption of neoliberal development theories in Latin America, with a particular emphasis on the Chilean experience. It delves into the comprehensive implementation of neoliberal reforms under the auspices of the Washington Consensus during the 1970s, charting the trajectory of Chile's economic hardships, its subsequent period of growth, and the enduring challenges of socio-economic inequality and insufficient social welfare systems. Despite Chile's transformation into one of the region's most affluent countries, the analysis exposes the intricate relationship between economic advancements and the overarching well-being of society. The widespread protests in 2019 against entrenched neoliberal policies serve as a poignant critique of the tangible disconnect between macroeconomic success and the populace's quality of life. Through this case study, the paper advocates for a recalibration of development theories to equally value human rights and social progress as indispensable counterparts to economic prosperity, proposing a more integrated framework for sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agosin Manuel R. (1998) Comercio y crecimiento en chile: Realizaciones del pasado y Perspectivas para elFuturo. Santiago: UN.

Berger, M.T. (2005) The battle for asia: From decolonization to globalization.London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Bosworth, B.P., Dornbusch, R. and Laban, R. (1994) The Chilean Economy: Policy Lessons and challenges. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

CHEW, S.C. and DENEMARK, R.A. (1996) The underdevelopment of development: Essays in honor ofAndre Gunder Frank. LONDON 6 BONHILL STREET:SAGE PUBLICATIONS.

Davis-Hamel, A. (2012) Successful neoliberalism?: State policy, poverty, and income inequality in Chile. Kansas: Pi Gamma Mu.

Diamond, J. (2017) Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York:W. W. Norton & Company.

Grandin, G. (2006) The road from serfdom, CounterPunch.org. Available at: https://www.counterpunch. org/2006/ 11/17/the-road-from-serfdom/.

Harvey, D. (2011) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hickel, J. (2016) “The true extent ofglobal poverty and hunger: Questioning the good news narrative of the millennium development goals,” Third World Quarterly, 37(5), pp. 749–767. Available at:https://doi.org/10. 1080/01436597.2015.1109439.

IMF. Western Hemisphere Dept. (2008) “Regional Economic Outlook, April 2008:

Western Hemisphere,” Regional Economic Outlook [Preprint]. Available at:https://doi.org/10.5089/978158 90671 72.086.

Lang, M. et al. (2018) Beyond Development: An Alternative Perspective in Latin America. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press.

Leys, C. (1996) The Rise & Fall ofDevelopment Theory. Nairobi: EAEP, East African Educational Publ.

Neoliberalism has had its day. so what happens next? | Martin Jacques (2016) The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug/21/death-of-neoliberalism- crisis-in-western-politics.

Peet, R. and Hartwick, E.R. (2015) Theories of development. New York: The Guilford Press.

Stiglitz, J.E. and Chang, H.-J. (2001) Joseph Stiglitz and the World Bank: The rebel within. London: Anthem Press.

Weyland, K. (1996) “Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected affinities,” Studies In Comparative International Development, 31(3), pp. 3–31.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02738987.

Williamson, J. (2000) “What should the World Bank think about the Washington Consensus?,” The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), pp. 251–264.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.251.