Challenges to Public Management and Reaction Strategies in the Modern Capitalist Society

Guojie Bi

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v6n1.31

Authors

Guojie Bi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v6n1.31

Keywords:

Public Administration, Globalization, Technology, Capital Society, Challenges, Strategies

Abstract

This paper analyzes the challenges encountered in modern capitalist societies and explores plausible reactions to these problems. Public administration must deal with the complex issues resulting from globalization, technological advancements, and demographic shifts, which generate obstacles to governance. The study highlights the theoretical and practical significance of comprehending these challenges to elevate efficiency in public administration. Through a combination of literature review and qualitative analysis, the study investigates the fundamental causes of these challenges like economic inequalities, governance limitations, and the widening social division, proposing adaptive strategies such as adopting digital governance, inclusive policy-making, and strengthened accountability. These strategies aim to foster equitable, sustainable, and efficient public management, and contribute to social stability and prosperity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1-25.

[2] Chaturvedi, V. (2007). Human Relations and Behavioural Approach to Management Thought.

[3] Montgomery, J. D., Glazer, N. (Eds.). (2002). Sovereignty under challenge: how governments respond. Transaction Publishers.

[4] Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity.

[5] Dunleavy, P., Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public money & management, 14(3), 9-16.

[6] Piketty, T., Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. The Quarterly journal of economics, 118(1), 1-41.

[7] Held, D., McGrew, A. (2007). Globalization/anti-globalization: Beyond the great divide. Polity.

[8] Kim, C. K. (2008). Public administration in the age of globalization. International Public Management Review, 9(1), 39-55.

[9] Rosenau, J. N. (2017). Globalization and governance: bleak prospects for sustainability. In Challenges of globalization (pp. 201-216). Routledge.

[10] Stern, N. (2006). Stern Review: The economics of climate change.

[11] Jager, N. W., Newig, J., Challies, E., & Kochskämper, E. (2020). Pathways to implementation: Evidence on how participation in environmental governance impacts on environmental outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 383-399.

[12] Bovens, M., Zouridis, S. (2002). From street‐level to system‐level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public administration review, 62(2), 174-184.

[13] Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital governance: New technologies for improving public service and participation. Routledge.

[14] Campos-Serna, J., Ronda-Pérez, E., Artazcoz, L., Moen, B. E., & Benavides, F. G. (2013). Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: a systematic review. International journal for equity in health, 12, 1-18.

[15] Levin, H. J. (1967). The limits of self-regulation. Colum. L. Rev., 67, 603.

[16] Mitchell, O. S., Myers, R. J., & Young, H. (Eds.). (1999). Prospects for social security reform. University of Pennsylvania Press.

[17] Rao, V. K. R. V. (1964). Redistribution of Income and Economic Growth in Underdeveloped Countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 10(1), 307-333.

[18] Repetti, J. R. (2001). Democracy, taxes, and wealth. NYUL Rev., 76, 825.

[19] Li, S., Zhao, R. (2011). Market reform and the widening of the income gap. Social Sciences in China, 32(2), 140-158.

[20] Perkins, F. (1934). Unemployment and relief. American Journal of Sociology, 39(6), 768-775.

[21] Agranoff, R., McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.

[22] Claussen, K. (2021). Trade administration. Virginia Law Review, 107(4), 845-917.

[23] Milakovich, M. E. (2021). Digital governance: Applying advanced technologies to improve public service. Routledge.

[24] Naidu, S. P. (2005). Public administration: Concepts and theories. New Age International.

[25] Raajpoot, U. A. (2000). Multicultural demographic developments: Current and future trends. Handbook of multicultural mental health, 79-94.

[26] Gruber, W. H., Niles, J. S. (1974). How to innovate in management. Organizational dynamics, 3(2), 31-47.

[27] Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century. Jhu Press.

[28] Mannarini, T., Fedi, A., Trippetti, S. (2010). Public involvement: How to encourage citizen participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(4), 262-274.

[29] Boehmer, H. M., Zaytsev, Y. K. (2019). Raising aid efficiency with international development aid monitoring and evaluation systems. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 15(32), 28-36.

[30] Shirato, L., Cogan, S., Yee, S. (2001). The impact of an automated storage and retrieval system on public services. Reference Services Review, 29(3), 253-261.

[31] Dutrénit, G., Suárez, M. (2018). Involving stakeholders in policymaking: tensions emerging from a public dialogue with knowledge-based entrepreneurs. Science and Public Policy, 45(3), 338-350.

[32] Lehtonen, P., Radzik-Maruszak, K. (2024). Inclusion as ownership in participatory budgeting: facilitators’ interpretations of public engagement of children and youth. Critical Policy Studies, 18(1), 73-91.

[33] Fiorino, D. J. (2010). Sustainability as a conceptual focus for public administration. Public administration review, 70, s78-s88.

[34] Shafiqul Huque, A. (2011). Accountability and governance: strengthening extra‐bureaucratic mechanisms in Bangladesh. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(1), 59-74.