Corroboration of the Probative Value of Children's Testimony in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Minors in China

Ni Wang

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v6n1.08

Authors

Ni Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v6n1.08

Keywords:

Cases of Sexual Assault of Minors, Children's Testimony, Credibility, Probative Value, Rules of Corroborating Evidence

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a high incidence of cases of sexual assault on minors in China, most of which occur in a hidden environment. Due to delayed disclosure and loss of physical evidence, children's testimony often becomes the key evidence for both conviction and sentencing. Against this background, this paper examines the issue of the probative value of children's testimonies in Chinese cases of sexual abuse of minors, aiming to provide references for relevant legislation and judicial practice. Through a combination of case analysis, comparative study, and literature review, this paper systematically examines the current situation of Chinese judicial practice, international experiences, and theoretical developments. The study found that children's testimony often faces the dilemma of "solitary evidence" because of its inherent limitations and the particularity of cases, and its probative value is often questioned in sexual assault cases. The existing laws and regulations in China do not take this into account sufficiently, and the traditional mode of corroborating evidence is difficult to effectively compensate for the inherent defects of children's testimony. International experience demonstrates that the establishment of professional inquiry mechanism, a scientific assessment system and a multi-agency collaboration platform can help improve the credibility of children's testimony. Based on these findings, this study proposes to improve the existing system in four areas: constructing a credibility assessment system for children's testimony, establishing a professional inquiry mechanism, clarifying applicable rules for corroborating children's testimony, and strengthening multi-agency collaboration. This research is of great significance for promoting the specialization of juvenile justice in China, which not only helps to improve the trial quality and efficiency of sexual assault cases of minors but also provides institutional safeguards for protecting the legitimate rights and interests of minors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yue Huiqing. (2018). Evidence Utilization in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Minors [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 21-25.

[2] Chen Pusheng. (2013). Criminal Evidence Law [M]. Taipei: San Min Book Co., 146-147.

[3] Li Shuqing. (2022). Research on the Rules of Supplementary Evidentiary Power of Children's Testimonies in Criminal Proceedings (Master's Thesis, Central China Normal University). Master's Degree. Retrieved from https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27159/d.cnki.ghzsu.2022.000047 doi: 10.27159/d.cnki.ghzsu.2022.000047.

[4] Xiang Yan. (2020). On the Refined Case-Handling Model in Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Chinese Journal of Criminal Law (02), 59-80. doi: 10.19430/j.cnki.3891.2020.02.004.

[5] Xiang Yan. (2018). On the Review Judgment of Victims' Statements in Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Global law review (06), 132-152.

[6] Zhang Hanyu & Wang Ying. (2019). Evidence Guidelines for Handling Sexual Assault Cases Involving Minors. Juvenile Delinquency Issues (04), 21-33.

[7] Zheng Lei & Shi Qian. (2017). Analysis of Evidence Examination in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Minors: Based on 172 Cases in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province. People's Procuratorate (08), 53-57.

[8] Fan Wenxin. (2021). Research on the Issues of Evidence in Cases of Sexual Assault Against Minors (Master's Thesis, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law). Master's Degree. Retrieved from https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27660/d.cnki.gzczu.2021.000132 doi: 10.27660/d.cnki.gzczu.2021.000132.

[9] Xiang Yan. (2020). On the Refined Case-Handling Model in Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Chinese Journal of Criminal Law (02), 59-80. doi: 10.19430/j.cnki.3891.2020.02.004.

[10] Xiang Yan. (2019). Research on the Evidentiary Challenges in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Minors: The Institutional Transformation of China's Criminal Evidence Model from Prosecution to Multiple Layers of "Authenticity." The Jurist (04), 160-174+196. doi: 10.16094/j.cnki.1005-0221.2019.04.012.

[11] He Ting & Lin Jiahong. (2017). The Three-Dimensional Construction of Legislation on Sexual Assault Against Minors in China: Drawing on the Experience of the United States. Juvenile Delinquency Issues (01), 60-69.

[12] Sun Hui. (2021). Study on the Problems of Obtaining and Admitting Children's Testimonies in Criminal Proceedings in China (Master's thesis, Qingdao University). Master's degree. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27262/d.cnki.gqdau.2021.000965doi:10.27262/d.cnki.gqdau.2021.000965.

[13] Wu Yan & Liu Tao. (2018). Difficulties and Countermeasures in Interviewing Victims in Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Journal of Guangxi Police College (06), 68-72. doi: 10.19736/j.cnki.gxjcxyxb.2018.06.012.

[14] Huang Qiqi & Liu Zhihong. (2021). Psychological Techniques for Enhancing the Evidentiary Power of Statements by Minor Victims in Sexual Assault Cases: Also, on the Application Prospects of Statement Validity Assessment. Journal of Hunan Police Academy (04), 14-22.

[15] Qin Hai & Tang Nandong. (2024). Construction of Rules for Reviewing and Judging Verbal Evidence in Criminal Cases Involving Minors: Focusing on the Credibility Assessment of Victim Statements. People's Judicature (01), 51-56. doi: 10.19684/j.cnki.1002-4603.2024.01.014.

[16] Zhao Shanshan. (2022). Research on the Reform of the Testimony Model for Child Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings in China. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law (04), 230-241.

[17] Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: a historical review and synthesis. Psychological bulletin, 113(3), 403.

[18] Pan Xingwen. (2023). Study on the Admissibility of Victims' Statements in Sexual Abuse of Minors Cases (Master's thesis, East China University of Politics and Law). Master's degree. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27150/d.cnki.ghdzc.2023.000788doi:10.27150/d.cnki.ghdzc.2023.000788.

[19] Gitlin, C. (2007). Expert testimony on child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome: How proper screening should severely limit its admission. QLR, 26, 497.

[20] Song Yuansheng. (2022). Limited Application of Evidence on Sexual Characteristics of Rape Victims. Global Law Review (04), 35-49.

[21] Zhou Hongbo. (2010). Criminal Proof Methods and Procedures in the Perspective of Comparative Law. Jurist (05), 30-48+176-177. doi: 10.16094/j.cnki.1005-0221.2010.05.011.

[22] Lamb, M. E., Brown, D. A., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2018). Tell me what happened: Questioning children about abuse. John Wiley & Sons.

[23] Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C Thomas Publisher.

[24] Köhnken, G. (2004). Statement validity analysis and the ‘detection of the truth’. The detection of deception in forensic contexts, 41, 63.

[25] Liu Qiang. (2018). A Procedural Law Perspective on Child Testimonies Abroad. Procuratorial Chronicle (09), 18-19.

[26] yamada, keiko. (2021). Credibility of statements of minor victims in sex crimes. Legal Studies Seminar, 66(8), 20-25.

[27] Li Xiaojie & Chen Jing. (2016). On the Establishment of Rules for the Corroboration of Verbal Evidence: Using Objective Evidence as the Basis for Corroboration. People's Judicature (Applied) (13), 65-69. doi: 10.19684/j.cnki.1002-4603.2016.13.015.

[28] Liu Ying & Xu Ye. (2019). Research on the Use of Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Minors: From the Perspective of the "One-Stop" Evidence Collection Model. Journal of Criminal Investigation Police University of China (06), 55-62. doi: 10.14060/j.issn.2095-7939.2019.06.007.

[29] Fan Wenwen & Wan Shian. (2024). Determination of the Authenticity of Victim Statements in Cases of Sexual Assault Against Minors: An Empirical Analysis Based on 742 Judgment Documents. Central South Law Review (00), 259-273.

[30] Zhou Yingying. (2021). From Corroboration to Rules of Experience: The Proof Challenges and Solutions in Sexual Assault Cases Against Minors in China. Contemporary Youth Studies (05), 83-88+102.

[31] Wu, Huimin. (2020). A Study on the Credibility Assessment of Victim Statements in Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Hebei Law Science (04), 186-200. doi: 10.16494/j.cnki.1002-3933.2020.04.014.

[32] Wang Xiaohua & Zhou Zixing. (2017). On the Probative Value of Children's Testimonies and the Court Appearance of Child Witnesses. Juvenile Delinquency Research(04), 28-35.

[33] Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990).

[34] Long Mou1 Criminal Judgment of the First Instance of Child Molestation, Case No.: (2020) Qian 2622 Criminal Investigation No. 27.

[35] Supreme People's Court and others. Opinions on Punishing Crimes of Sexual Abuse against Minors According to Law [EB/OL]. Supreme People's Court website,2013-10-23.

[36] White Paper on Procuratorial Work of Minors (2023) of the Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (issued on May 31, 2024).