The Role of TikTok (Douyin) in Shaping Private and Public Spheres and Youth Political Voice

Manxi Lu

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v5n3.05

Authors

Manxi Lu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v5n3.05

Keywords:

TikTok (Douyin), Digital Communication, Private and Public Sphere, Political Expression, Social Media Influence

Abstract

This article examines the impact of TikTok (known as Douyin in China) on the relationship between the private and public spheres in the digital era. Drawing on Habermas's public sphere theory and other relevant academic perspectives, it argues that while Douyin has redefined the interaction between the private and public spheres by enabling users to share private lives publicly and blurring the boundaries, there are significant limitations when it comes to its suitability as an ideal public sphere for young people to voice political views in China. The platform's entertainment content, recommendation algorithm, strict censorship, and emotional nature of discussions lead to fragmented, superficial, and restricted political conversations. Although young people find creative ways to express political ideas, real in-depth and diverse political discussions are hindered. Overall, Douyin has blurred the boundaries between the private and public spheres to an extent but has many constraints as a platform for political discussion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.

[2] Castells, M. (2007). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

[3] Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. Cambridge University Press.

[4] Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160

[5] Gladwell, M. (2010). Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted. The New Yorker.

[6] Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.

[7] Lagerkvist, J. (2010). After the internet, before democracy: Competing norms in Chinese media and society. Peter Lang.

[8] Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), The Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39-56). Routledge.

[9] Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.

[10] Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

[11] Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Emotion and public participation in political communication: Discourse, emotion and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

[12] Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Zone Books.