What are the Strengths and Limitations of Queer Theory for Understanding the Categories of Gender, Sexuality and Bodies

Fangbin Li

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v5n2.25

Authors

Fangbin Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v5n2.25

Keywords:

Queer Theory, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Bodily Classifications, Sexual Ethics

Abstract

This article explores the development of Queer Theory and its impact on gender, sexual behavior, and bodily classifications. The theory is believed to have originated from an article by Teresa de Lauretis in 1991, initially aimed at unifying the LGBTQ+ community in response to the backlash against sexual minority rights in the latter half of the 20th century. Over time, the term "queer" has evolved to encompass individuals and communities diverging from mainstream sexual behaviors, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming individuals, as well as heterosexual individuals engaging with Queer Theory. It challenges the binary gender structure and norms of traditional LGBTQ+ cultures, emphasizing the performative nature of gender and resisting categorization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bailey, M.E., 2002. Foucauldian feminism: Contesting bodies, sexuality and identity. In Up Against Foucault (pp. 109-132). Routledge.

[2] Beloso, B.M., 2017. Queer Theory, Sex Work, and Foucault’s Unreason. Foucault Studies, pp.141-166.

[3] Burroughs, W. S. (1986) Queer. London: Picador.

[4] Green, A. I. (2007) ‘Queer Theory and Sociology: Locating the Subject and the Self in Sexuality Studies’, Sociological theory, 25(1), pp. 26–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00296.x.

[5] Herek, G.M., 2004. Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 1, pp.6-24.

[6] Lee, R. (2019) ‘Queering Lactation: Contributions of Queer Theory to Lactation Support for LGBTQIA2S+ Individuals and Families’, Journal of human lactation, 35(2), pp. 233–238. doi: 10.1177/0890334419830992.

[7] Morland, I. and Willox, D. (2005) Queer theory. Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

[8] Nagoshi, J.L. and Nagoshi, C.T., 2013. Gender and sexual identity: Transcending feminist and queer theory. Springer Science & Business Media.

[9] Simon, W., 2017. Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Routledge.

[10] Valocchi, S., 2005. Not yet queer enough: The lessons of queer theory for the sociology of gender and sexuality. Gender & society, 19(6), pp.750-770.

[11] Watson, K., 2005. Queer theory. Group analysis, 38(1), pp.67-81.

[12] West, C. and Zimmerman, D. (1987), “Doing Gender”, Gender & Society, 1 (2) 125 – 151.

[13] Young, I.M., 1997. Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton University Press.

[14] Young, R.M. and Meyer, I.H., 2005. The trouble with “MSM” and “WSW”: Erasure of the sexual-minority person in public health discourse. American journal of public health, 95(7), pp.1144-1149.