Analysis of the Double Defendant System of Administrative Reconsideration

Yidi Li; Xintong Li

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v4n2.47

Authors

Yidi Li
Xintong Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v4n2.47

Keywords:

Administrative Reconsideration, Reconsideration Maintenance, Double Defendant System

Abstract

Since 2014 Administrative Procedure Law revised and established the administrative reconsideration Double Defendant System, the reconsideration “Maintenance meeting” phenomenon although has changed, but all kinds of problems come one after another, such as confusion of function orientation, violation of the principle of “Evidence before judgment”, increasing the burden of litigation and impairing the plaintiff's right of free choice. Article 10 of the Administrative Review Law of the People's Republic of China (revised)(draft for consultation) , published by the Ministry of Justice on November 24,2020, even abolished thedouble defendant System, although it was reinstated in the new law on Administrative Review adopted at the fifth session of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on September 1,2023, but this kind of system's repetition reflects undoubtedly double defendant System has not developed mature, needs to continue consummates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yang Tianhang, Wang Xiaohui. Re-discussion on the quality effect of the system of co-defendant in Administrative Review ーー a perspective of the system taking the revision of Administrative Review Law as an opportunity [ J ] . Shanghai Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 23,2022: Studies on the rule of law in social governance, 2022(23) : 6-11.

[2] Sun Ge. Review and reconstruction of the double-accused system: Based on the background of the revision of the Administrative Review Law [ J ] . Journal of Tangshan University, 2021(4) : 70-80.

[3] Qing Feng, Zhang Shuihai. Reflection by the administrative review organ on the question of being a defendant in administrative proceedings [ J -RSB- . Studies in administrative law, 2013(1) : 9-14 + 79.

[4] Gao Jie. An analysis of the evidence-presenting system of the review organ under thedouble defendant System [ J ] . Journal of Shandong University of Science and technology (social science edition) , 2021(5) : 51-57.

[5] Liang Junyu. Reconsideration of maintaining the“Two-accused system”[ J ] . Hebei law, 2019(6) : 73-84.

[6] Yang Xinya. On the predicament and future of the co-defendant system in administrative review [ J ] . Studies in administrative law, 2021(4) : 134-146.

[7] Cao Liu, Feng Jian. The dilemma and reform of the Double Defendant System of administrative reconsideration [ J ] . Chinese and foreign law, 2019(5) : 1217-1233.

[8] Sun Ge. Review and reconstruction of the double-accused system-based on the background of the revision of the Administrative Review Law [ J ] . Journal of Tangshan University, 2021(4) : 70-80.

[9] Lian Yuqiang. The relationship between the functional orientation of administrative reconsideration and the scope of cases [ J ] . Journal of the National Institute of Public Prosecutors, 2023(2) : 128-142.

[10] Chen Jinbo. Unbearable Weight: Reflections on the dual-accused system of Administrative Review [ J ] . Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, 2022(4) : 89-97.

[11] Xiong Minrui, Shi Mengdi. An analysis of the reform path of administrative reconsideration system in our country ーー also on the mode of Administrative Reconsideration Committee and Administrative Reconsideration Bureau [ J ] . Journal of Social Sciences, Harbin Normal University, 2022(2) : 56-60.

[12] Xin Chun Ying. Interpretation of the law of administrative procedure of the People's Republic of China [ M ] . Beijing: Law Press, 2014:27-32.