Research on Judicial Application of Soil Pollution Remediation Responsibility in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v4n1.38Keywords:
Soil Pollution Prevention and Control, Judicial Application, Repair ResponsibilityAbstract
The Soil Pollution Prevention and Control Act of the People's Republic of China was enacted on January 1st, 2019, thereby establishing a solid legal foundation to enhance and regulate soil pollution control measures within China, and addressing the deficiencies and completing the legal framework for soil pollution prevention and control. However, in the specific judicial practice process, the determination and the determination of soil pollution remediation liability often involves intricate processes and ever-changing characteristics, and the relevant legislation on soil pollution management responsibility needs further improvement. This study utilizes a sample of 12 soil pollution infringement cases from real-world judicial practice to examine the application and enforcement of remediation responsibilities in such instances.It clarifies difficulty in sharing responsibilities between the responsible entities, proving causal relationships, unclear direction of remediation costs, and unclear protection and remediation standards. Based on the analysis, this article further suggests pertinent strategies to refine and enhance the judicial application mechanism for addressing soil pollution remediation responsibilities within China and better protect the soil ecological environment.
Downloads
References
[1] 2023 China Ecological Environment Status Bulletin, published on the website of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, https://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/202305/ P0202305 29570623593284.pdf.
[2] Article 2 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China stipulates that civil law regulates the personal and property relationships between natural persons, legal persons, and unincorporated organizations as equal subjects.
[3] Liang Qinghua, Zhang Yiming. Research on Objective Related Joint Tort Liability under Insufficient Conditions: An Explanatory Study of Article 1172 of the Civil Code [J]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 50 (05): 40-47.
[4] Wang Lizheng, Wang Jinxiang. Ecological environment restoration responsibility in the Civil Code [J]. Tianjin Law, 2020 (3): 35-41.
[5] Shi Xiaobo, Lu Bingquan. On the Proof of Causal Elements in Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation [J]. Henan Social Sciences, 2024, 32 (02): 43-52.
[6] Lv Zhongmei, Dou Haiyang. Reconstructing the Environmental Infringement Relief System with the Theory of Ecological Restoration [J]. Chinese Social Sciences, 2020, (02): 118-140+206-207.
[7] Cao Mingde. Environmental and Resource Protection Law [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2020:39.
[8] Bai Jiayu. Research on the Prevention and Control of Agricultural Soil Pollution from the Perspective of the New Environmental Protection Law [J]. Resource Conservation and Environmental Protection, 2023, (03): 130-133.
[9] Zhao Dan, Yu Fang, Liao Xiaoyong, et al. Remediation status of contaminated sites in developed countries (regions) and its enlightenment to China [J]. Journal of University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023,40 (04): 441-452.
[10] Mao Qingfang, Liu Shiqi. Establishment and Improvement of Ecological Environment Restoration Responsibility in the Ecological Environment Responsibility Compilation [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 23 (03): 16-25.
[11] Zhang Ting, Ning Qingtong. Analysis of China's ecological restoration acceptance system [J]. Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School, 2019, (04): 97-104.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.