Disability and Loneliness: A Critical Study of Males under British Social Policies

Shuheng Guo

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v4n1.18

Authors

Shuheng Guo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v4n1.18

Keywords:

Evidence for Policy and Practice, Social-ecological Models, Disabled Males, Social Policy, Loneliness

Abstract

Loneliness, which is a subjective perception of an individual’s feelings about social relationships, is a public health problem that can easily be overlooked, especially in the disabled population. The complexity of loneliness deserves to be analysed in depth when gender factors and disability co-exist. Employing a case study approach, this paper explores social policy options for loneliness among adult disabled men in the UK from an Evidence for Policy and Practice perspective, taking full account of the unique sensitivities of this group. Based on the theoretical framework of socio-ecological models and the policy cycle, the study critically discusses three cases of social policy evidence in recent years, identifying the strengths and limitations of different policies. Finally, this paper offers some recommendations for addressing the policy problem of loneliness among males with disabilities from the perspective of social policymakers, creating a more inclusive and supportive social environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Mann, F., Bone, J., Lloyd-Evans, B., et al. “A life less lonely: the state of the art in interventions to reduce loneliness in people with mental health problems”. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, vol.52, 627-638, 2017.

[2] Kelly, D., Steiner, A., Mazzei, M. et al. “Filling a void? The role of social enterprise in addressing social isolation and loneliness in rural communities”. Journal of Rural Studies, vol.70, pp.225-236, 2019.

[3] Willis, P., Vickery, A. “Loneliness, coping practices and masculinities in later life: Findings from a study of older men living alone in England”. Health & Social Care in the Community, vol.30, no.5, pp. e2874-e2883, 2022.

[4] Covo, Y. “Inverse Integration and the Relational Deficit of Disability Rights Law”. Columbia Law Review, vol.124, no.3, pp.563-632, 2024.

[5] Hogg, J., Moss, S., Cooke, D. Ageing and mental handicap, vol. 24. Taylor & Francis, 2024.

[6] Emerson, E., Fortune, N., Llewellyn, G. et al. “Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study”. Disability and Health Journal, vol.14, no.1, pp.100965-100965, 2021.

[7] Macdonald, S. J., Deacon, L., Nixon, J., et al. ““The invisible enemy”: disability, loneliness and isolation”. Disability & Society, vol.33, no.7, pp.1138-1159, 2018.

[8] Adams, W. M., Sandbrook C. “Conservation, evidence and policy”. Oryx, vol.47, no.3, pp.329-335, 2013.

[9] Nutley, S., Powell, A., Davies, H. What counts as good evidence? Provocation paper for the Alliance for Useful Evidence. London: AUE, 2013.

[10] Nevo, I., Slonim-Nevo, V. “The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice”. The British Journal of Social Work, vol.41, no.6, pp.1176-1197, 2011.

[11] Kumah, E. A., McSherry, R., Bettany‐Saltikov, J. et al. “Evidence‐informed vs evidence‐based practice educational interventions for improving knowledge, attitudes, understanding and behaviour towards the application of evidence into practice: A comprehensive systematic review of undergraduate students”. Campbell Systematic Reviews, vol.18, no.2, pp. e1233, 2022.

[12] Chowdhury, S. K., Keary, A., Saito, E. “Rohingya students’ voices on the experience of inclusion/exclusion in the non-formal schooling: How do issues about being displaced, with (out) disability, having behavioral problems, and gender itself matter?”. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol.145, pp.104615, 2024.

[13] Purkait, T. “Farm to Preschool Programs and Its Impact on Children’s Dietary Health: Evaluation Through Bronfenbrenner’s Socio-Ecological Model”. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, pp.1-13, 2024.

[14] Golden, S. D., McLeroy, K. R., Green, L. W. et al. “Upending the Social Ecological Model to Guide Health Promotion Efforts Toward Policy and Environmental Change”. Health Education & Behavior, vol.42, no.1_suppl, pp.8S-14S, 2015.

[15] Badri, M., Alkhaili, M., Aldhaheri, H. et al. “Determined to be resilient: Analysis of the well-being of people with disabilities (People of determination) in Abu Dhabi during the COVID-19 pandemic”. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, vol.7, no.1, pp.189-201, 2024.

[16] Bourceret, A., Amblard, L., Mathias, J.D. “Governance in social-ecological agent-based models: a review”. Ecology and Society, vol.26, no.2, pp.38, 2021.

[17] Bridgman, P., Davis, G. “What Use is a Policy Cycle? Plenty, if the Aim is Clear”. Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol.62, no.3, pp.98-102, 2003.

[18] Burholt, V., Windle, G., Morgan, D. J. “A Social Model of Loneliness: The Roles of Disability, Social Resources, and Cognitive Impairment”. The Gerontologist, vol.57, no.6, pp.1020-1030, 2017.

[19] Emerson, E., Stancliffe, R. J., Aitken, Z. et al. “Disability and loneliness in the United Kingdom: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of trends and transitions”. BMC Public Health, vol.23, no.1, pp.2537-2537, 2023.

[20] Terzian, E., Tognoni, G., Bracco, R., et al. “Social Network Intervention in Patients with Schizophrenia and Marked Social Withdrawal: A Randomized Controlled Study”. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol.58, no.11, pp.622-631, 2013.

[21] Mccorkle, B. H., Dunn, E. C., Yu M.W., et al. “Compeer Friends: A Qualitative Study of a Volunteer Friendship Programme for People with Serious Mental Illness”. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, vol.55, no.4, pp.291-305, 2009.

[22] Simpson, A., Flood, C., Rowe, J., et al. “Results of a pilot randomised controlled trial to measure the clinical and cost effectiveness of peer support in increasing hope and quality of life in mental health patients discharged from hospital in the UK”. BMC Psychiatry, vol.14, no.1, pp.30-30, 2014.

[23] Castelein, S., Bruggeman, R., Van Busschbach, J. T. et al. “The effectiveness of peer support groups in psychosis: a randomized controlled trial”. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol.118, no.1, pp.64-72, 2008.

[24] Janssen, M., Helbig, N. “Innovating and changing the policy-cycle: Policy-makers be prepared”. Government Information Quarterly, vol.35, no.4, pp. S99-S105, 2018.