Social Semiotic Analysis of a Pet Protection Post on Instagram

Authors

  • Yaling Deng
  • Shu Li
  • Biner Lu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v3n3.48

Keywords:

Visual Grammar, Social Semiotics, Pet Protection, Instagram, Social Media

Abstract

This study applies Kress and Van Leeuwen's Visual Grammar framework to analyze an Instagram post advocating pet protection. The research focuses on representational, interactive, and compositional metafunctions to understand how visual and textual elements combine to convey urgency and empathy. The representational analysis highlights the dog's isolated portrayal and the use of the pronoun "me" to foster an emotional connection. The interactive analysis examines indirect gaze, close-up shots, and low angles to engage viewers and emphasize their role in pet protection. The compositional analysis reveals the strategic placement of verbal and visual elements, with bold text and contrasting colors enhancing the message's salience. This multimodal approach demonstrates the synergy between visual and textual elements, creating a cohesive and persuasive narrative. The study's findings align with existing literature on social semiotics and Visual Grammar, emphasizing the importance of integrated visual strategies in social media advocacy. The research offers practical insights for designing effective pet protection campaigns, highlighting the role of Visual Grammar in promoting responsible pet ownership and animal welfare. Future research should explore the long-term impact of these visual strategies on viewer behavior and the effectiveness of different semiotic modes across various social media platforms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Al-Ghamdi, N., & Albawardi, A. H. (2020). Multivocality of Saudi COVID-19 Discourse in Social Media Posts: A Socio-Semiotic Multimodal Perspective. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(4), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-13.

Aji, A. P. (2019). The Role of social media in shaping the animal protection movement in Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 3(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v3i3.1666.

Belgrimet, S., & Rabab’ah, G. (2021). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of English Posters in Violence Awareness Campaigns against Women. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.17507/ tpls. 1102.12.

Bouvier, G., & Way, L. C. S. (2021). Revealing the politics in “soft”, everyday uses of social media: the challenge for critical discourse studies. Social Semiotics, 31(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1930855.

Dallyono, R., & Sukyadi, D. (2019). An analysis of multimodal resources in environmental protection posters. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20245.

Feng, D., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2012). Representing emotive meaning in visual images: A social semiotic approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(14), 2067–2084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.003.

Feng, W. D. (2017). Metonymy and visual representation: towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication, 16(4), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217717142.

Fischer, K., & Aarestrup, M. (2021). Relationships between construction grammar(s) and genre: Evidence from an analysis of Instagram posts. Journal of Pragmatics, 183, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.017.

Friedman, A., & Ron, S. (2017). Unlocking the power of Visual Grammar theory: analyzing social media political advertising messages in the 2016 US election. Journal of Visual Literacy, 36(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144x.2017.1379758

Gunarti W.W., W. (2018). Understanding Visual Grammar on the Stop Smoking Public Service Announcement: Analysis of Television Ad “Vocal Cords Loss Due to Smoke.” KnE Social Sciences, 3(11), 117. https://doi.org/10.18 502/kss.v3i11.2755.

Hartung, F., Burke, M., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M. (2016). Taking Perspective: Personal Pronouns Affect Experiential Aspects of Literary Reading. PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0154732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0154732.

Havens, L. (1988). Making Contact. Harvard University Press.

Hinzo, A. M., & Clark, L. S. (2019). Digital survivance and Trickster humor: exploring visual and digital Indigenous epistemologies in the #NoDAPL movement. Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1573911.

Hoffmeyer, J. (1997). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Indiana University Press.

Isti’anah, A., Rahmasari, S., & Lauwren, S. (2021). Post-Pandemic Indonesian Tourism Promotion in Instagram: Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Journal of Modern Languages, 31(2), 46–76. https://doi.org/10.22452/jml. vol31no2.3.

Kissas, A. (2022). Populist everyday politics in the (mediatized) age of social media: The case of Instagram celebrity advocacy. New Media & Society, 26(5), 146144482210920. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221092006.

Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images : the grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Parikh, K. (2011). Colour Symbolism - Emotional Values of Colour. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 3(1), 65–66. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/jan2013/26.

Penley, C. (2013). Feminism and Film Theory (pp. 57–68). Routledge.

Raisborough, J., Taylor, L., Harrison, K., & Dulson, S. (2022). The Cutaway to the Toilet: Towards a Visual Grammar of Spatial Stigma in Factual Welfare Television. Sociological Research Online, 28(2), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804211066118.

Sierra Rativa, A., Postma, M., & Van Zaanen, M. (2020). The Influence of Game Character Appearance on Empathy and Immersion: Virtual Non-Robotic Versus Robotic Animals. Simulation & Gaming, 51(5), 685–711. https://doi. org/10.1177/1046878120926694.

Sipe, L. R. (1998). How Picture Books Work: A Semiotically Framed Theory of Text-Picture Relationships. Children’s Literature in Education, 29(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022459009182.

Smith, G. M. (2007). Film structure and the emotion system. Cambridge University Press.

Thurlow, C., Aiello, G., & Portmann, L. (2019). Visualizing teens and technology: A social semiotic analysis of stock photography and news media imagery. New Media & Society, 22(3), 146144481986731. https://doi.org/10.11 77/1461444819867318.

Tomlinson, M. K. (2021). Moody and monstrous menstruators: the Semiotics of the menstrual meme on social media. Social Semiotics, 31(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1930858.

Yu, H.-C. (2014). A cross-cultural analysis of symbolic meanings of color. Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 49–74. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142663743.

Downloads

Published

21-07-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Deng, Y., Li, S., & Lu, B. (2024). Social Semiotic Analysis of a Pet Protection Post on Instagram. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 3(3), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v3n3.48