Reassessment of the Emission Reduction Responsibilities of Wealthy Individuals and Corporations: Considerations based on the Perspective of Resource Availability

Zhengting Liu; Canni Lin

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v3n1.09

Authors

Zhengting Liu
Canni Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v3n1.09

Keywords:

Climate Change, Emission Reduction, Resources, Sustainable Development

Abstract

Minimizing emissions has become a crucial element in the fight against global climate change. This study will employ resource dependence theory to assess the participation of wealthy individuals and corporations in the worldwide effort to decrease emissions, particularly with regards to natural, human, and capital resources. The objective is to demonstrate the crucial role that affluent individuals and major corporations play in promoting climate action. In conclusion, we recommend enhancing the management of these organizations' resource utilization and implementing stronger environmental protection measures to prevent their economic activities from undermining the attainment of global climate objectives. This study offers fresh insights into comprehending and advancing more efficient worldwide strategies for reducing emissions, emphasizing the substantial influence of affluent individuals and major corporations who exploit resources in global emissions reduction endeavors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kenner, D. (2019). Carbon inequality: The role of the richest in climate change. Routledge.

Grasso, M. and Vladimirova, K. (2020). A moral analysis of carbon majors' role in climate change. Environmental Values, 29(2), pp.175-195.

McNamara, R.S. (1972). ‘Address to the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm’, June 8, 1972.

CBD. (2022). Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity 15/4. Kunming-montreal global biodiversity framework. https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-15/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf.

IPCC (2018). Summary for Policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5℃. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5℃ above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) In Press.

Oxfam and Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) (2020). The Carbon Inequality Era: An Assessment of the Global Distribution of Consumption Emissions Among Individuals from 1990 to 2015 and Beyond. Oxford: Oxfam and Stockholm Environment Institute. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/handle/10546/621049.

Cohen, S., Liu, H., Hanna, P., Hopkins, D., Higham, J. and Gössling, S. (2022). The rich kids of Instagram: Luxury travel, transport modes, and desire. Journal of Travel Research, 61(7), pp.1479-1494.

Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of management, 39(6), 1666-1698.

Tester, J. W., Drake, E. M., Driscoll, M. J., Golay, M. W., & Peters, W. A. (2012). Sustainable energy: choosing among options. MIT press.

Popescu, V. D., Munshaw, R. G., Shackelford, N., Montesino Pouzols, F., Dubman, E., Gibeau, P., ... & Palen, W. J. (2020). Quantifying biodiversity trade-offs in the face of widespread renewable and unconventional energy development. Scientific reports, 10(1), 7603.

Mussard, M. (2017). Solar energy under cold climatic conditions: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 733-745.

Vakulchuk, R., Overland, I., & Scholten, D. (2020). Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 122, 109547.

Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of business venturing, 25(5), 439-448.

Mishra, P. (2017). Green human resource management: A framework for sustainable organizational development in an emerging economy. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5), 762-788.

Liao, H., & Cao, H. S. (2013). How does carbon dioxide emission change with the economic development? Statistical experiences from 132 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1073-1082.

Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (2021). The measurement and performance of the Danish innovation system in relation to sustainable development. In Globalisation, New and Emerging Technologies, and Sustainable Development: The Danish Innovation System in Transition (pp. 252-266). Routledge.

Liu, J. H., & Meng, Z. (2017). Innovation model analysis of new energy vehicles: taking Toyota, Tesla and BYD as an example. Procedia engineering, 174, 965-972.

Hargadon, A. (2003). How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. Harvard Business Press.

Pizzigati, S. (2005). The rich and the rest: The growing concentration of wealth. The Futurist, 39(4), 38.

Siddiqui, K. (2018). Imperialism and global inequality: A critical analysis. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 5(2), 266-291.

Pappas, D. (2019). Energy and emissions accounting: The case of intra-regional industrial shifts in SE Asia (Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia).

Walenta, J. (2021). The making of the corporate carbon footprint: the politics behind emission scoping. Journal of Cultural Economy, 14(5), 533-548.

Muradian, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2001). Trade and the environment: from a ‘Southern’perspective. Ecological Economics, 36(2), 281-297.