The Concept of 'Doctorateness' and the Architecture of a PhD Thesis-from an Applied Linguistic Point of View

Authors

  • Cheng Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v2n3.41

Keywords:

Doctorateness, Applied linguistics, PhD Thesis

Abstract

The term 'doctorateness' is the nominalization of word 'doctorate' which is defined concisely as 'the highest degree awarded by the university'. The concept of 'doctorateness' has been discussed and developed by several experts whose analysis was conducted recently, providing a current perspective on the defining attributes of the concept. It can be defined as: Individual scholar, an apprenticeship process of development, original conceptual contribution, highest academic degree, stewardship of the discipline. This study can serve as a reference for building the framework in the Architecture of a PhD Thesis, and contribute to the understanding and development of the concept of doctorateness within the field of doctoral education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B.Minto, (2010). The Minto Pyramid Principle: The Logic of Thinking, Expressing, and Problem Solving ISBN 0-9601910-4-6.

Chong, S. W., & Plonsky, L. (2021). A primer on Qualitative Research Synthesis in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 1024–1034.

Christian W. Chun (ed.) (2022). Applied Linguistics and Politics. Bloomsbury. 320pp. ISBN 978-1-350-09823-7.

Deshors, S. C. (2020b). English as a lingua franca: A random forests approach to particle placement in multi-speaker interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 214-231.

Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540-561.

Macaro, E. (2020). Systematic reviews in applied linguistics. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 230-252). New York: Routledge.

Mendoza, N., & Phung, H. (2019). Motivation to learn languages other than English: A critical research synthesis. Foreign Language Annals, 52 (1): 121–140.

Park, C. (2005). New Variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207.

Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2017). Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to anova in l2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 579-592.

Song, Q. (2023). Review of Chun (2022): Applied Linguistics and Politics. Journal of Language and Politics, 22(5), 775–778.

Thomson, P., & Walker, M. (2021). The Routledge doctoral student’s companion: getting to grips with research in education and the social sciences.

Yazdani, S., & Shokooh, F. (2018). Defining Doctorateness: a Concept Analysis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 031–048.

Downloads

Published

17-04-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, C. (2024). The Concept of ’Doctorateness’ and the Architecture of a PhD Thesis-from an Applied Linguistic Point of View. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 2(3), 297-300. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v2n3.41