Research on the Judicial Confirmation Procedure of Civil Mediation Agreements

Authors

  • Dan Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v2n3.27

Keywords:

Mediation Agreement, Judicial Confirmation, Review Criteria, Remedial Measures

Abstract

After the revision of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China in 2021, the scope of application of judicial confirmation has been expanded, but the effective application of this procedure has not been increased from the actual effect. As a non litigation procedure, it plays an irreplaceable role in the context of the reform of complex and simple separation and the establishment of a sound and diversified dispute resolution mechanism. However, since its establishment, this procedure has been controversial in terms of its nature, effectiveness, and other issues. Although it was ultimately included in the Civil Procedure Law as a non litigation procedure, there are still many shortcomings in its legal norms in terms of application subjects, initiation methods, review standards, etc. Analyze the inherent legal support and practical difficulties of these issues, and improve the connection between moral governance, rule of law, and social governance. The trinity of judicial confirmation procedures maximizes the release of the value of judicial confirmation procedures, which is of great significance for promoting the development of mediation systems, thereby promoting the governance of litigation sources to alleviate court litigation pressure, and improving diversified dispute resolution mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Liu Min. On Optimizing Judicial Confirmation Procedures [J]. Contemporary Law, 2021, 35 (04): 7382.

Xiong Jiayang. On the issue of judicial confirmation and enforcement of mediation agreements [J]. Journal of Jiujiang University (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 40 (04): 121124.

Zhou Ming. Improvement of Review Rules for Judicial Confirmation Cases under the Diversified Dispute Resolution System: From the Perspective of Preventing the Risk of False Mediation Agreements [D]. 2022.131-138.

Tian Zhengzheng. Research on Judicial Confirmation Procedure [C]. East China University of Political Science and Law, 2017.

Liu Jialiang. Functional Interpretation of Judicial Confirmation Procedure [J]. Political and Legal Review, 2018, (04): 6071.

Zhu Ming. The application path of diversified dispute resolution mechanisms in the judicial confirmation process of mediation agreements [J]. Legal Expo, 2021, (33): 100101.

Martin. On the Structural Optimization of Judicial Confirmation Procedures [J]. Journal of Suzhou University (Law Edition), 2021, 8 (04): 122136.

Xu Jinxin. Establishment of Element based Review Standards for the Executable Content of Judicial Confirmation Procedures - From the Perspective of 527 Judicial Confirmation Rulings in Agricultural Cases [J]. Journal of Shandong Judges Training College, 2021, 37 (04): 2737.

Ma Xiao, Supreme People's Court. Institutional positioning, promotion principles, and working mechanisms for optimizing judicial confirmation procedures [N]. People's Court Journal, 20200326.008.

Wang Xingfei. The opening work of research on judicial confirmation procedures [J]. People's Rule of Law, 2019, (22): 116117.

Liu Jialiang. Significant advantages and future prospects of judicial confirmation procedures [J]. Oriental Law, 2018, (05): 2937.

Hu Junhui; Zhao Yiyu. On the Scope of Res Judiciary and Procedural Guarantee of Judicial Confirmation and Adjudication [J]. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 42 (04): 3640.

Wang Guozheng; Liu Xie ci. Comparative Analysis of Judicial Confirmation Procedures and Related Legal Protection Mechanisms for Mediation Agreements [J]. Hunan Forum, 2018, 31 (02): 171176.

Wang Gali. Coupling of Civil Judicial Confirmation Procedure and Notary Mediation System [J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 16 (06): 122126.

He Lianhong; Shu Qiulan. On the Examination Boundary and Remedial Path of Judicial Confirmation of Administrative Mediation Agreements for Patent Disputes [J]. Intellectual Property, 2017, (01): 6367.

Duan Yuhong. Practical Analysis of Prosecutorial Supervision over Judicial Confirmation Procedures [J].

Interim decision in Boots judicial review halts union recognition process[J].The Pharmaceutical Journal, 2014.

The character of justice: rhetoric, law, and politics in the Supreme Court confirmation process[J].Choice Reviews Online, 2006, (02).

Mark E. Owens.Changing Senate Norms: Judicial Confirmations in a Nuclear Age[J].PS: Political Science & Politics, 2018.

Downloads

Published

17-04-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, D. (2024). Research on the Judicial Confirmation Procedure of Civil Mediation Agreements. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 2(3), 200-204. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v2n3.27