The Criminal Intent in American Criminal Law and its Special Provisions in Murder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v2n3.01Keywords:
American Criminal Law, Murder, Criminal Intent, Malice AforethoughtAbstract
In American criminal law, criminal intent is an essential element of crime, which determines the precise accusation of this crime or that crime, and even the total difference from guilt and innocence. In criminal law legislation, criminal intent is usually divided into general intent which is the least requirement to accuse a crime, and specific intent which is only necessary for some particular crimes. As for the conviction and sentencing of murder, there was no such general or specific crime intent requirement in early common law, that is, as long as the actor illegally caused the death of others even with no intent to kill, he could be prosecuted of murder. With the development of criminal law in the United States, the actor’s intention and motive when the crime committed gradually stand out and become an important factor of sentencing, which produces a series of special provisions on criminal intent. On the basis of general intent of American criminal law, this article mainly analyzes the specific intent and its special provisions of murder laws, and points out that premeditation and malice aforethought are the important criterions for judging the type and severity of murder in most American states.
Downloads
References
William J. Stuntz, Joseph L. Hoffman, Defining Crimes, 3rd ed., New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2017, p. 91.
Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250-51 (1952).
Joel Samaba, Criminal Law, 12th ed., Boston: Cengage Learning, 2017, pp. 126-127.
Joshua Dressler, Understanding Criminal Law, 3rd ed., New York: Lexis Publisher, 2001, pp. 16-17.
Id, pp. 14-15.
See [1], pp. 136-141.
Hall Jerome, Intoxication and Criminal Responsibility, 57 Harvard Law Review 7, (1944).
See [1], pp. 141-145.
People v. Stark, 26 Cal. App. 4th 1179; 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 887 (1994).
People v. Sargent, 19 Cal. 4th 1206; 970 P.2d 409 (1999).
See [1], pp. 92-99.
United States v. Cortes-Caban, 691 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2013).
Id.
Hall Jerome, General Principles of Criminal Law, 2nd ed., Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960, p. 142.
Stephen A. Saltzburg, Criminal Law: Cases and Materials, 3rd ed., Newark, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 2009, pp. 257-258.
Francis Bowes, Sayre, Mens Rea, 45 Harvard Law Review 6, 974-1026 (1932).
See [1], p. 759.
Commonwealth v. Coleman, 747 N.E.2d 666 (2001).
Commonwealth v. Judge, 420 Mass. 433, 437, 650 N.E.2d 1242 (1995).
Commonwealth v. Ruci, 409 Mass. 94, 96, 564 N.E.2d 1000 (1991).
Commonwealth v. Davis, 403 Mass. 575, 582, 531 N.E.2d 577 (1988).
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 349 (1981).
Black’s Law Dictionary 438 (7th ed. 1999).
Byford v. State, 116 Nev. 215, 235, 994 P.2d 700 (2000).
Ellis v. State, 120 Ala. 333, 338-9, 25 So. 1, 2-3 (1898).
Pembrook v. State, 117 Neb. 759, 763, 222 N. W. 956, 957 (1929).
People v. Weeks, 104 Cal. App. 708, 712, 286 Pac. 514, 515 (1930).
Stephen James Fitzjames, A History of the Criminal Law of England, London: MacMillan and Co., 1883, p. 70.
Rollin M. Perkins, Re-Examination of Malice Aforethought, 43 Yale Law Journal 4, 537-570 (1934).
See [1], p. 766.
People v. Knoller, 41 Cal. 4th 139, 158 P.3d 731 (2007).
Jens David Ohlin, Criminal Law: Doctrine, Application, and Practice, 2nd ed., New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2018, pp. 279-280.
Taylor v. State, 282 Ga. 44, 644 S.E.2d 850 (2007).
Rollin M. Perkins, Re-Examination of Malice Aforethought, 43 Yale Law Journal 4, 537-570 (1934).
People v, Knoller, 59 Cal. Rptr. 3d 157 (2007).
People v. Phillips, (1966) 414 P.2d 353.
Stephanie Spies, Malice Aforethought and Self-defense: Mutually Exclusive Mental States?, 91 New York University Law Review 4, 1027-2059 (2016).
Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 500 (1951).
Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250-51 (1952).
Leelen Coacher, Libby Gallo, Criminal Liability: Transferred and Concurrent Intent, 44 Air Force Law Review, 227-242(1998).
People v. Billa, 31 Cal. 4th 1064; 79 P.3d 542 (2003).
People v. Dillon, 34 Cal. 3d 441, 477, 668 P.2d 697 (1983).
See [1], p. 788.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
