Micro Enterprises, Human Agency and Business Success: Evidence from Malaysia

Yue Jiang; Chunyan Wang

doi:10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.66

Authors

Yue Jiang
Chunyan Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.66

Keywords:

Micro entrepreneurship, Human agency theory, Cognitive Processes, Entrepreneurial success

Abstract

Using Human agency theory, this study aimed to investigate rovide a nuanced understanding of how microentrepreneurs navigate the complexities of starting and managing their businesses. It also intended to discover the characteristics of the human agency that contribute to the success of a micro business, as well as the life experiences that micro entrepreneurs learned. This qualitative study employs structured interviews with 41 microentrepreneurs from various industries in Malaysia. Participants' ages ranged from 22 to 34, with business experience varying from 1 to 4 years. The data were analyzed thematically to identify key patterns and insights into the cognitive processes of intentionality, forethought, self-reactiveness, and self-reflection, as well as the influence of life circumstances on entrepreneurial behavior. The findings reveal that microentrepreneurs are highly adaptable, with motivations deeply rooted in personal experiences and life circumstances. Key motivations include financial independence, family support, and the desire to create a personal legacy. The cognitive processes of intentionality, forethought, self-reactiveness, and self-reflection are pivotal in shaping entrepreneurial actions. Life experiences such as previous work, education, and significant life changes profoundly influence these cognitive processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Tahir, H.M., Razak, N.A. and Rentah, F., 2018. The contributions of small and medium enterprises (SME’s) On Malaysian economic growth: A sectoral analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research 2018: KEER 2018, 19-22 March 2018, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia (pp. 704-711). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_73

[2] Online, T. S. (2024, June 13). Empowering Micro Enterprises to expand businesses. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2024/06/13/empowering-micro-enterprises-to-expand-businesses

[3] Ambad, S.N.A., Andrew, J.V. and Awang Amit, D.H.D., 2020. Growth challenges of SMEs: empirical evidence in Sabah, Malaysia. ASEAN Entrepreneurship Journal (AEJ), 6(1), pp.8-14. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/43932

[4] McMullen, J.S., Brownell, K.M. and Adams, J., 2021. What makes an entrepreneurship study entrepreneurial? Toward a unified theory of entrepreneurial agency. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 45(5), pp.1197-1238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720922460

[5] Ramoglou, S., Gartner, W.B. and Tsang, E.W., 2020. “Who is an entrepreneur?” is (still) the wrong question. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, p.e00168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00168

[6] Muñoz, P., 2018. A cognitive map of sustainable decision-making in entrepreneurship: A configurational approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(3), pp.787-813. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2017-0110

[7] Christensen, B.T., Arendt, K.M., McElheron, P. and Ball, L.J., 2023. The design entrepreneur: How adaptive cognition and formal design training create entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. Design Studies, 86, p.101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101181

[8] Visvizi, A., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M. and Loia, F., 2022. Think human, act digital: activating data-driven orientation in innovative start-ups. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), pp.452-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2021-0206

[9] Chen, C.P. and Hong, J.W.L., 2020. Applying career human agency theory to practice. Australian Journal of Career Development, 29(2), pp.87-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416220901808

[10] Bandura, A. (2023). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective on human nature. John Wiley & Sons. p.156.

[11] Prince, S., Chapman, S. and Cassey, P., 2021. The definition of entrepreneurship: is it less complex than we think?. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(9), pp.26-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0634

[12] Kelly, R., 2020. Collaborative creativity: Educating for creative development, innovation and entrepreneurship. Brush Education.

[13] Code, J., 2020, February. Agency for learning: Intention, motivation, self-efficacy and self-regulation. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 5, p. 19). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019

[14] Palmer, C., Fasbender, U., Kraus, S., Birkner, S. and Kailer, N., 2021. A chip off the old block? The role of dominance and parental entrepreneurship for entrepreneurial intention. Review of Managerial Science, 15(2), pp.287-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00342-7

[15] Pinto Borges, A., Lopes, J.M., Carvalho, C., Vieira, B.M. and Lopes, J., 2021. Education as a key to provide the growth of entrepreneurial intentions. Education+ Training, 63(6), pp.809-832. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2020-0052