Location Evaluation Based on AHP-TOPSIS Model

Authors

  • Hao Wang
  • Rongjie Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.42

Keywords:

Evaluating Decisions, AHP-TOPSIS- FCEM Models, Insurance Models

Abstract

Extreme-weather events bring a large scope of influence, cause a large degree of loss and a wide range, how to design a model that is both economical and effective in the evaluation and preservation of landmark buildings has aroused our attention. We firstly use AHP-TOPSIS-FCEM Model to establish comprehensive risk expression for four kinds of Extreme-weather events and weight them as comprehensive meteorological disaster risk assessment factors; we establish vulnerability analysis expression from the economic and social perspectives, and then combine the two to obtain comprehensive insurance risk index, which can be used as the trigger condition of index-based insurance. Then the insurance company's profit model is established: there is a functional relationship between the insurance company's premiums and claims among and the comprehensive insurance risk index. Our model has excellent evaluation decision-making functions, and the integrated disciplines as well as comprehensive factors make it highly practical, which can be extended to evaluation decision-making in investment, urban planning, and other fields in the future with the addition of variable rate adjustment and optimization of missing data values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Du, F. (2020). Scale Evaluation of Urban Park Landscape Spaces Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method [D]. Henan Agricultural University.

[2] Barnett, B. J., & Mahul, O. (2007). Weather Index Insurance for Agriculture and Rural Areas in Lower-Income Countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(5), 1241-1247.

[3] Smith, R. C., & Watts, M. (2012). The role of index insurance in agricultural risk management: A review. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(4), 779-802.

[4] Marr, A., Winkel, A. van Asseldonk, M., Lensink, R., & Bulte, E. (2016). Adoption and impact of index-insurance and credit for smallholder farmers in developing countries: A systematic review. Agricultural Finance Review, 76(1), 94-118.

[5] Yang, T., Liu L., Bai Y., et al. (2022).Review of Research Progress on Agricultural Index Insurance. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science). 58(3): 501-510.

[6] Tian, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, L., et al. (2004) Research on Expert Opinion Integration Model Based on Delphi Method. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice. (01):57-62+69.

[7] Bommer J, Spence R, Erdik M, et al. (2002). Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. Journal of seismology. 6: 431-446.

[8] Liu, K., Sun, Q., Liu, W. Multi-Scenario Energy Storage Selection Method Based on AHP and TOPSIS-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. Energy Storage Science and Technology. 1.

[9] Liu, L., Dai, X. (2004). Comprehensive Assessment and Zoning of Risk Degree for China's Natural Disaster Insurance. Journal of Mountain Science, 22(4): 477-482."

[10] Smolka A. (2006). Natural disasters and the challenge of extreme events: risk management from an insurance perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 364(1845): 2147-2165.

[11] Clarke D J. (2016). A theory of rational demand for index insurance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8(1): 283-306.

Downloads

Published

27-08-2024

Issue

Section

Arcicles

How to Cite

Wang, H., & Zhang, R. (2024). Location Evaluation Based on AHP-TOPSIS Model. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 4(1), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.42