A Prospective Study on the Economic Effects of China-GCC FTA - Simulation and Analyses Based on GTAP Model

Authors

  • Yifan Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.25

Keywords:

GTAP, GCC, Tariffs, Technical barriers to trade, Forward-looking analyses

Abstract

In the context of the "Belt and Road" initiative, this paper is based on the China-GCC FTA negotiations, and uses the Global Trade Analysis Model (GTAP) to construct six scenarios of tariff reduction in key sectors and reduction of technical barriers to trade (TBT) between China and the GCC countries, and to assess the impacts of the construction of the FTA on the economies of China and related countries. The paper shows that increased trade liberalization has a positive economic impact on the China-GCC FTA. At the same time, tariff changes in the manufacturing and oil and gas industries dominated the tariff reductions, but the reduction of technical barriers to trade (TBT) has a particularly significant impact compared to tariffs. Bilateral trade will contribute more remarkably to China's continued economic growth than in the GCC countries. Reductions in trade barriers will effectively boost production demand in Chinese and GCC countries, contributing imports, exports and output, which will benefit both economies, specially, China's trade surpluses increasing particularly in various sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Mo CHEN. Exploring Economic Relations between China and the GCC States. [J]. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), 2011, Volume 5, Issue 4, PP. 88-105.

[2] Yang Guang. China's strategic and mutually beneficial economic and trade relations with the Gulf countries [J]. International Economic Review, 2014, Issue 3: 101-109.

[3] Kitou E. & G. Philippidis. A Quantitative Economic Assessment of a Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic Trade Assessment [J]. Thirteenth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, 2010: 9-11.

[4] Nomura R., Ohkawa T., Okamura M., et al. Does a Bilateral FTA Pave the Way for Multilateral Free Trade? [J]. Review of International Economics, 2013, 21(1): 164-176.

[5] Francois J., Manchin M., Norberg H., et al. Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment: An Economic Assessment [R]. Institute for International and Development Economics, 2013.

[6] Min-Hua Chiang. East Asia: An International Quarterly [J], 2019, Volume 36, Issue 4, PP. 271-290.

[7] OECD. An Assessment of the Cost for International Trade in Meeting Regulatory Requirements. TD/TC/WP (99)8/FINAL, Puris: OECD, 1999.

[8] Otsuki, T., J.S. Wilson, M. Sewadeh. What price precaution? European harmonisation of aflatoxin regulations and African groundnut exports [J]. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2001, 28(2): 263-283.

[9] Cheng Lingmin. Study on the Economic Effects of China-GCC Free Trade Agreement - Based on GTAP Model and Bias Effect Decomposition [D]. Guizhou Province: Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020.0-70.

[10] SHE Li, YANG Liqiang. GTAP simulation analysis of the impact of China-GCC FTA on bilateral trade [J]. Asia-Pacific Economy, 2012, 06 Issue: 37-41.

[11] Liu Sujun, Li Donglin. Research on the economic effect of China-GCC FTA under the perspective of "Belt and Road" - Simulation analysis based on GTAP [J]. Industrial Technology and Economics, 2017, No. 9 (Total 287): 137-145.

[12] Yang Shaoyan, Li Juan. The economic impact of technical barriers to trade on the establishment of FTA between China and GCC - A simulation study based on the GTAP model [J]. Asia-Pacific Economy, 2019, 05 Issue: 14-23+149.

[13] Wang Guozhi, Ge Yanzhao. Analysis of the economic and trade basis and expected effects of the establishment of China-GCC FTA [J]. Research on Indian Ocean Economies, 2017(05): 99-122+140-141.

Downloads

Published

27-08-2024

Issue

Section

Arcicles

How to Cite

Wu, Y. (2024). A Prospective Study on the Economic Effects of China-GCC FTA - Simulation and Analyses Based on GTAP Model. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 4(1), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.25