Application and Empirical Analysis of Asset Pricing Models in the Chinese Stock Market

Authors

  • Qiannian Yue

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.15

Keywords:

Asset Pricing Models, CAPM, Fama-French Model, Carhart Model, Chinese Stock Market, Empirical Analysis, Market Efficiency, Risk Factors, Investment Strategies

Abstract

This paper examines the application and performance of asset pricing models in the Chinese stock market. We analyze the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the Fama-French Three-Factor Model, and the Carhart Four-Factor Model, assessing their effectiveness in explaining stock returns within the context of China's unique market environment. Using data from major Chinese stock exchanges, we employ regression analysis to evaluate the models. Our findings reveal that multifactor models, particularly the Carhart model, provide superior explanatory power compared to CAPM, highlighting the importance of incorporating additional risk factors. This study contributes to the understanding of asset pricing in emerging markets and offers practical insights for investors and policymakers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442.

[2] Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.

[3] Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768-783.

[4] Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.

[5] Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.

Downloads

Published

27-08-2024

Issue

Section

Arcicles

How to Cite

Yue, Q. (2024). Application and Empirical Analysis of Asset Pricing Models in the Chinese Stock Market. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 4(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n1.15