Research on ecological risk attribution and source apportionment of new pollutants in watershed water driven by explainable AI

Authors

  • Xingrui Qi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v8n3.02

Keywords:

Explainable AI, Watershed water bodies, New pollutants, Ecological risk attribution, Source apportionment, SHAP-LIME model

Abstract

In response to the weak interpretability and poor accuracy of traditional methods for source apportionment of new pollutants in river basins, this study selected the Niyang River Basin on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (agricultural dominant type) and The Upper Reaches of the Taohe River Basin on the Loess Plateau (urban-rural composite type) as research areas, and constructed an ecological risk attribution and source apportionment system that integrates SHAP-LIME interpretable AI. According to the Technical Guidelines for Accuracy Assessment of New Pollutant Screening - Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (Trial) and the Technical Guidelines for Accuracy Assessment of New Pollutant Screening - Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (Trial) (China National Environmental Monitoring Center, 2023), an active-passive joint sampling method was adopted to set up 20 monitoring points in two major watersheds, collect water samples during the wet and dry seasons of 2022-2023, and detect 33 antibiotics, 4 parabens, and 6 types of microplastics in the laboratory. Integrating landscape pattern data released by the National Geographical Condition Monitoring Cloud Platform with real-time climate data measured by hydrological stations in the basin to quantify the contribution of pollution sources and risk driving mechanisms. The results show that the fusion model achieves an analytical accuracy with R² = 0.65; Urban domestic sewage, large-scale aquaculture wastewater, and agricultural runoff are the core sources of pollution, contributing 38.2%, 27.5%, and 21.3% respectively; The average concentrations of microplastics and antibiotics were 1831 items/L and 55.33 ng/L, respectively, both exceeding the watershed background threshold. This study confirms that explainable AI can break through the black box bottleneck of traditional models, clarify the pathways of factor action, and provide technical support for precise control of new pollutants in watersheds. The full text data is sourced from field monitoring of the watershed and core journals such as Environmental Science and China Environmental Monitoring, and is authentic and traceable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science advances, 3(7), e1700782.

[2] Han Y R, Xu W H. Ecological risks of antibiotics and characteristics of microbial diversity in aquaculture farms and surrounding environmental media. Environmental Science, 2024, 45(11): 6594-6603. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202311023.

[3] Zheng, Y., & Keller, A. A. (2007). Uncertainty assessment in watershed‐scale water quality modeling and management: 1. Framework and application of generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach. Water resources research, 43(8).

[4] Wang, R., Kim, J. H., & Li, M. H. (2021). Predicting stream water quality under different urban development pattern scenarios with an interpretable machine learning approach. Science of the Total Environment, 761, 144057.

[5] Zhang, Z., Huang, J., Duan, S., Huang, Y., Cai, J., & Bian, J. (2022). Use of interpretable machine learning to identify the factors influencing the nonlinear linkage between land use and river water quality in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Ecological Indicators, 140, 108977.

[6] Mei, K., Shi, H., Wu, Y., Dahlgren, R. A., Ji, X., Yang, M., & Guan, Y. (2025). Impact of landscape patterns on river water quality: Spatial-scale effects across an agricultural-urban interface. Ecological Indicators, 170, 113019.

[7] Shi, J., Jin, R., Zhu, W., Tian, L., & Lv, X. (2022). Effects of multi-scale landscape pattern changes on seasonal water quality: a case study of the Tumen River Basin in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(51), 76847-76863.

[8] Nallakaruppan, M. K., Gangadevi, E., Shri, M. L., Balusamy, B., Bhattacharya, S., & Selvarajan, S. (2024). Reliable water quality prediction and parametric analysis using explainable AI models. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 7520.

[9] Salim, I., Sajjad, R. U., Paule-Mercado, M. C., Memon, S. A., Lee, B. Y., Sukhbaatar, C., & Lee, C. H. (2019). Comparison of two receptor models PCA-MLR and PMF for source identification and apportionment of pollution carried by runoff from catchment and sub-watershed areas with mixed land cover in South Korea. Science of the Total Environment, 663, 764-775.

[10] Bydalek, F., Webster, G., Barden, R., Weightman, A. J., Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., & Wenk, J. (2023). Microplastic biofilm, associated pathogen and antimicrobial resistance dynamics through a wastewater treatment process incorporating a constructed wetland. Water Research, 235, 119936.

[11] Wang, G., Mang, S., Cai, H., Liu, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, L., & Innes, J. L. (2016). Integrated watershed management: evolution, development and emerging trends. Journal of Forestry Research, 27(5), 967-994.

Downloads

Published

20-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Qi, X. (2026). Research on ecological risk attribution and source apportionment of new pollutants in watershed water driven by explainable AI. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 8(3), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v8n3.02