Path Planning Techniques for Additive Manufacturing: A Review

Authors

  • Ning Zhang
  • Jiahe Hu
  • Jinglong Zhang
  • Jiahui Li
  • Dongxia Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v6n1.10

Keywords:

Additive Manufacturing, Path Planning, Multi-objective Optimization

Abstract

Path planning plays a pivotal role in additive manufacturing by determining the movement of the toolhead during material deposition, which directly affects print quality, material usage, manufacturing efficiency, and functional performance. This review systematically examines recent developments in path planning strategies across various AM processes. We categorize existing approaches based on their primary objectives, including enhancing print quality, reducing time and material consumption, and achieving specific printing properties such as mechanical strength, aesthetics, or thermal/electrical performance. Emerging trends such as energy-aware path planning, multi-objective optimization, and learning-based strategies are also discussed. Finally, we identify current challenges and outline promising research directions, including generalizable planning frameworks, trade-off analysis between objectives, and standardized benchmarking. This review aims to serve as a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners seeking to optimize AM processes through innovative path planning techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jiang, J.; Lou, J.; Hu, G. Effect of support on printed properties in fused deposition modelling processes. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2019, 14, 308–315.

[2] Adam Pajonk, et al. Multi-material additive manufacturing in architecture and construction: a review, J Build Eng, 45 (2022), Article 103603.

[3] R. Leal, et al. Additive manufacturing tooling for the automotive industry, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 92 (2017), pp. 1671-1676.

[4] Filipa A.M.M. Gonçalves, et al. The potential of unsaturated polyesters in biomedicine and tissue engineering: synthesis, structure-properties relationships and additive manufacturing, Prog Polym Sci, 68 (2017), pp. 1-34.

[5] Byron Blakey-Milner, et al. Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: a review, Mater Des, 209 (2021), Article 110008.

[6] Jiang, J.; Xu, X.; Stringer, J. Optimisation of multi-part production in additive manufacturing for reducing support waste. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2019, 14, 219–228.

[7] Gao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ramanujan, D.; Ramani, K.; Chen, Y.; Williams, C.B.; Wang, C.C.L.; Shin, Y.C.; Zhang, S.; Zavattieri, P.D. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput. Des.2015, 69, 65–89.

[8] Jin, G.; Li, W.; Tsai, C.; Wang, L. Adaptive tool-path generation of rapid prototyping for complex product models. J. Manuf. Syst. 2011, 30, 154–164.

[9] Ezair, B.; Fuhrmann, S.; Elber, G. Volumetric covering print-paths for additive manufacturing of 3D models. Comput. Des. 2018, 100, 1–13.

[10] Jensen, M.L.; Mahshid, R.; D’Angelo, G.; Walther, J.U.; Kiewning, M.K.; Spangenberg, J.; Hansen, H.N.; Pedersen, D.B. Toolpath Strategies for 5DOF and 6DOF Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4168.

[11] Routhu, S.; Kanakanala, D.; Ruan, J.; Liu, X.F.; Liou, F. 2-D Path Planning for Direct Laser Deposition Process. In Proceedings ofthe Volume 1: 36th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B; ASME International: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 415–423.

[12] Comminal, R.; Serdeczny, M.P.; Pedersen, D.B.; Spangenberg, J. Motion planning and numerical simulation of material deposition at corners in extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 29, 100753.

[13] Ding, D.; Pan, Z.; Cuiuri, D.; Li, H. A tool-path generation strategy for wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 73, 173–183.

[14] Eiliat, H.; Urbanic, J. Visualizing, analyzing, and managing voids in the material extrusion process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 96, 4095–4109

[15] Xiong, Y.; Park, S.-I.; Padmanathan, S.; Dharmawan, A.G.; Foong, S.; Rosen, D.W.; Soh, G.S. Process planning for adaptive contour parallel toolpath in additive manufacturing with variable bead width. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 4159–4170

[16] Ding, D.; Pan, Z.; Cuiuri, D.; Li, H.; Van Duin, S.; Larkin, N. Bead modelling and implementation of adaptive MAT path in wire and arc additive manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Manuf. 2016, 39, 32–42.

[17] Jin, Y.-A.; He, Y.; Xue, G.-H.; Fu, J.-Z. A parallel-based path generation method for fused deposition modeling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 77, 927–937.

[18] Jensen, M.L.; Mahshid, R.; D’Angelo, G.; Walther, J.U.; Kiewning, M.K.; Spangenberg, J.; Hansen, H.N.; Pedersen, D.B. Toolpath Strategies for 5DOF and 6DOF Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4168.

[19] Bui, H.; Pierson, H.A.; Nurre, S.G.; Sullivan, K.M. Tool Path Planning Optimization for Multi-Tool Additive Manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 39, 457–464.

[20] Choi, S.; Zhu, W. A dynamic priority-based approach to concurrent toolpath planning for multi-material layered manufacturing. Comput. Des. 2010, 42, 1095–1107.

[21] Li, N.; Link, G.; Wang, T.; Ramopoulos, V.; Neumaier, D.; Hofele, J.; Walter, M.; Jelonnek, J. Path-designed 3D printing for topological optimized continuous carbon fibre reinforced composite structures. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 182, 107612.

[22] Asif, S. Modelling and Path Planning for Additive Manufacturing of Continuous Fiber Composites; Sabanci University: Istanbul, Turkey, 2018.

[23] Lin, S.; Xia, L.; Ma, G.; Zhou, S.; Xie, Y.M. A maze-like path generation scheme for fused deposition modeling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 104, 1509–1519.

[24] Deuser, B.; Tang, L.; Geldmeier, J.; Landers, R.G.; Leu, M.C. Process planning and control for functionally graded material fabrication using freeze-form extrusion fabrication. In Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Missouri University of Science and Technology: Rolla, MO, USA, 2011.

[25] Jiang, J.; Weng, F.; Gao, S.; Stringer, J.; Xu, X.; Guo, P. A support interface method for easy part removal in directed energy deposition. Manuf. Lett. 2019, 20, 30–33.

[26] Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, J.; Wu, D. Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning. Robot. Comput. Manuf. 2019, 57, 488–495.

Downloads

Published

12-05-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, N., Hu, J., Zhang, J., Li, J., & Wang, D. (2025). Path Planning Techniques for Additive Manufacturing: A Review. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 6(1), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v6n1.10