Study on the Influencing Factors of College Students Using AIGC to Assist Studies Behavior

Yuqing Ma

doi:10.62051/ijcsit.v4n1.06

Authors

Yuqing Ma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v4n1.06

Keywords:

AIGC, Artificial intelligence, College student, TPB theory, TAM model

Abstract

This study explores the influencing factors of college students' use of AIGC to assist studies behavior, builds a new model which combines TAM model and TPB theory, and adds the factor of trust into the model. At the same time, it explores differences of the use of AIGC to assist studies behavior of liberal arts students and science students. Data were collected by distributing questionnaires online and spreading questionnaires on social platforms, and a total of 418 valid questionnaires were collected. Regression analysis shows that the use of AIGC is influenced by five factors. Among the influencing factors, liberal arts students are more significantly affected by subjective norms and trust, while science students are more significantly affected by perceived behavior control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jeffrey, T. (2020) Understanding college student perceptions of artificial intelligence. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 18(2), 8-13.

[2] Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023) Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100180.

[3] Zhang, Q., Wang, K., & Zhou, S. (2020) Application and practice of vr virtual education platform in improving the quality and ability of college students. IEEE Access, (99), 1-1.

[4] Ajzen, I., (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

[5] Roy, R., Babakerkhell, M. D., Mukherjee, S., Pal, D., & Funilkul, S. (2022) Evaluating the intention for the adoption of artificial intelligence-based robots in the university to educate the students. IEEE Access, 10, 125666-125678.

[6] Chai, C. S., Wang, X., & Xu, C. (2020) An extended theory of planned behavior for the modelling of Chinese secondary school students’ intention to learn artificial intelligence. Mathematics, 8(11), 2089.

[7] Pertiwi, D., & Purnama, N. B. (2023) Integration of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) in E-learning with Zoom. Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science, 3(04), 248-265.

[8] Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

[9] Khan, F. A., Khan, N. A., & Aslam, A. (2024) Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management: An Application of TOE-TAM Model. Research and Review: Human Resource and Labour Management, 22-36.

[10] Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021) Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120880.

[11] Khan, F. A., Khan, N. A., & Aslam, A. (2024) Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management: An Application of TOE-TAM Model. Research and Review: Human Resource and Labour Management, 22-36.

[12] Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023) Trust in AI and its role in the acceptance of AI technologies. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1727-1739.

[13] Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., Alkathiri, N. A., & Al-Alawi, A. N. (2024) Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Technology in Society, 77, 102521.

[14] Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations.