Evaluation of Earthquake Hazard Risk Level Based on Random Forest

Authors

  • Qiqi Song
  • Xinyue Wu
  • Yanan Lv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v2n2.31

Keywords:

Earthquake Disaster; Risk Level Assessment; Machine Learning; RF

Abstract

Earthquakes, highly destructive natural disasters, pose significant challenges to China, a country situated at the intersection of two major seismic belts. The risk of earthquake disasters has been escalating due to population density and rapid economic development, threatening the safety of people's lives and the sustainability of the national economy. Therefore, rapid and accurate earthquake risk assessment is crucial for disaster prevention and mitigation. With the advancement of artificial intelligence technology, machine learning algorithms have become vital tools in earthquake science research. This study aims to develop a nationwide earthquake risk assessment model, utilizing earthquake data from 2005 to 2020. Through preprocessing techniques such as normalization, discretization, and type conversion, combined with Spearman correlation analysis to select key indicators. After training and testing with BP neural network, SVM, and Random Forest models, the Random Forest model demonstrated the best performance in key metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 Score, proving its superior classification capability. After a comprehensive evaluation, the Random Forest model was chosen as the preferred model for earthquake risk assessment, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jena, Ratiranjan, et al. "Integrated model for earthquake risk assessment using neural network and analytic hierarchy process: Aceh province, Indonesia." Geoscience Frontiers 11.2 (2020): 613-634.

Freeman JR. 1932. Earthquake damage and earthquake insurance. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Algermissen S T, Steinbrugge K V,1984: Seismic Hazard and risk assessment: Some case studies[J], The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, Vol.9, PP8-26.

Kircher, Charles A., Robert V. Whitman, and William T. Holmes. "HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods." Natural Hazards Review 7.2 (2006): 45-59.

Gogtay, Nithya J., and Urmila M. Thatte. "Principles of correlation analysis." Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 65.3 (2017): 78-81.

Breiman, Leo. "Random forests." Machine learning 45 (2001): 5-32.

Ho, Tin Kam. "The random subspace method for constructing decision forests." IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 20.8 (1998): 832-844.

Amit, Yali, and Donald Geman. "Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees." Neural computation 9.7 (1997): 1545-1588.

Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees (1st ed.). New York/Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Bernard, Simon, Laurent Heutte, and Sébastien Adam. "A study of strength and correlation in random forests." Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications: 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computing, ICIC 2010, Changsha, China, August 18-21, 2010. Proceedings 6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.

Boinee, Praveen, Alessandro De Angelis, and Gian Luca Foresti. "Meta random forests." International Journal of Computational Intelligence 2.3 (2005): 138-147.

Hawkins, Douglas M. "The problem of overfitting." Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 44.1 (2004): 1-12.

Downloads

Published

23-04-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Song, Q., Wu, X., & Lv, Y. (2024). Evaluation of Earthquake Hazard Risk Level Based on Random Forest. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2(2), 268-276. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v2n2.31