Current and Emerging Deep Learning Methods for Flood Simulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v2n2.12Keywords:
Flood evolution; Artificial Intelligence; Deep Learning; Numerical MethodAbstract
In today's world, the development of flood simulation technology is crucial for urban planning and disaster management. However, traditional flood simulation methods are often constrained by the complexity of terrain and meteorological changes, making it difficult to accurately predict the occurrence and impact range of floods. In order to overcome these challenges, the introduction of deep learning technology has brought new ideas and possibilities for flood simulation. By using deep learning models to learn and analyze a large amount of flood data, researchers can more accurately predict the occurrence time, intensity, and impact range of floods, providing strong support for urban planning and emergency response. This article summarizes and discusses traditional flood simulation methods and deep learning based flood simulation methods, and provides prospects for future development.
Downloads
References
Zhang, D., Yan, D., Wang, Y. (2014). Research progress on risk assessment and comprehensive response to urban waterlogging disasters. Journal of Disaster Management, 29(01),144-149.
Huang, D., Liu, C., Peng, S. (2007). Research progress on flood risk assessment and zoning. Progress in Geographic Science, (04):11-22.
Christopher, Z. (2001). Review of urban storm water models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 16: 195-231.
Cen, G., (1990). Urban rainwater runoff calculation model. Journal of Water Resources, 10:68-75
Zhou, Y., Zhao, H. (1997). Research on Urban Rainwater Runoff Model. China Water Supply and Drainage, 13(4): 4-6.
Zhang, T., Feng, P., Cedo, M. (2016). Application of a three-dimensional unstructured mesh finite-element flooding model and comparison with two-dimensional approaches. Water Resources Management, 30(2):823-841.
Yang, D., Hou, J., Zhang, Z. (2019). The application of unmanned aerial laser radar technology in flood simulation. Flood Control and Drought Relief in China, 29(08):25-29.
Ortiz, P. (2014) Shallow water flows over flooding areas by a flux-corrected finite element method. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 52(2): 241-252.
Patera, A.T. (1984). A spectral element method for fluid dynamics: Laminar flow in a channel expansion. Journal of Computational Physics, 54(3): 468-488.
Colagrossi, A., Landrini, M. (2003). Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 191(2):448-475.
Randles, P.W., Libersky, L.D. (1996). Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Some recent improvements and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 139(1–4):375-408.
Biscarini, C., Francesco, S.D., Manciola, P. (2010). CFD modelling approach for dam break flow studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(4):705-718.
Tan, W. (1998). Hydrodynamics numeration: Application of finite volume model. Beijing: Tsinghua Press, 1998:69-78.
Zhang, D., Li, D., Wang, X. (2008). Numerical modeling of dam-break water flow with wetting and drying change based on unstructured grids. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 27(5):97-102.
Kvocka, D., Falconer, R.A., Bray, M. (2015). Appropriate model use for predicting elevations and inundation extent for extreme flood events. Natural Hazards, 79(3): 1791- 1808.
Hayder, I.M., Al-Amiedy, T.A., Ghaban, W., Saeed, F., Nasser, M., Al-Ali, G.A., Younis, H.A. (2023). An Intelligent Early Flood Forecasting and Prediction Leveraging Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms with Advanced Alert System. Processes, 11, 481.
Moy de Vitry, M., Kramer, S., Wegner, J.D., Leitão, J.P. (2019). Scalable flood level trend monitoring with surveillance cameras using a deep convolutional neural network. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4621–4634.
Pham, B.T., Luu, C., Dao, D.V., Phong, T.V., Nguyen, H.D., Le, H.V., von Meding, J., Prakash, I. (2021). Flood risk assessment using deep learning integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis. Knowl. Based Syst., 219, 106899.
Jakovljevic, G., Govedarica, M., Alvarez-Taboada, F., Pajic, V. (2019). Accuracy Assessment of Deep Learning Based Classification of LiDAR and UAV Points Clouds for DTM Creation and Flood Risk Mapping. Geosciences, 9, 323.
Wang, Y., Liu, J., Li, C. (2023). A data-driven approach for flood prediction using grid-based meteorological data. Hydrological Processes, 37(3).
Nevo, S., Morin, E., Gerzi, R. (2022). Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework. Hydrology and Earth System Science,26(15).
Wan, X., Wu, Q., Cao, Z. (2022). Real-time flood forecasting based on a general dynamic neural network framework. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 37(1).
Indra., G, Duraipandian, N. (2023). Modelling of Optimal Deep Learning Based Flood Forecasting Model Using Twitter Data .Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 35(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Baiqiang Li, Yuan Gao

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







