Analysis of different detection methods for pulmonary tuberculosis

Authors

  • Haowei Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/s5fnzw35

Keywords:

Tuberculosis test; MTB; Pathological test; Immunological test; Molecular biological test.

Abstract

Tuberculosis is classified as a chronic respiratory disease with its pathogen being Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). It poses a significant health threat due to its highly contagious nature and is difficulty in treatment. Various methods are employed to test for tuberculosis, including pathological, immunological and molecular biological tests. Each test has its unique principles and all are different in effects, and are widely used in clinical practice. In this research, principles, development and effects of each type of tests in testing pulmonary tuberculosis will be explored respectively. Additionally, the review will provide insights into the optimization of tuberculosis testing by comparing and contrasting different testing methods. Pathological tests represent the most traditional approach to testing for tuberculosis. Bacterial culture, a pathological test, is the gold standard of tuberculosis test. Nevertheless, it suffers from a long detection time. Meanwhile, immunological tests and molecular biological tests benefits from a fast detection, while the accuracy of the tests can be influenced by multiple factors. Thus, it will accelerate the detection speed while enhancing the precision to combine three different kinds of tests in clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Okoya F, Huang C C, Zhang Z, et al. 2023 The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 27 (7) 557 - 563.

Vilchèze C, Kremer L. 2017 Microbiology spectrum 5 (2) DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0003 - 2015.

Chen P, Shi M, Feng G D, et al. 2012 Journal of clinical microbiology 50 (4) 1166 - 1170.

Tansuphaisiri U, Kladphuang B. 2002 Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 33 (1) 128 - 135.

Halliday A, Masonou T, Tolosa-Wright M, et al. 2019 Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 13 (6) 521 - 532.

Wyndham-Thomas C, Dirix V, Schepers K, et al. 2015 BMC infectious diseases 15 1 - 11.

Pourakbari B, Yousefi K, Mahmoudi S, et al. 2019 Infectious Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-Infectious Disorders) 19 (2) 141 - 144.

Teixeira H C, Abramo C, Munk M E. 2007 Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia 33 323 - 334.

Aagaard C, Brock I, Olsen A, et al. 2004 Journal of Infectious Diseases 189 (5) 812 - 819.

Hu X, Liao S, Bai H, et al. 2020 Journal of clinical microbiology 58 (7) DOI: 10.1128/jcm. 01973 - 19.

Kaforou M, Broderick C, Vito O, et al. 2022 Immunological Reviews 309 (1) 97 - 122.

Anderson S T, Kaforou M, Brent A J, et al. 2014 New England Journal of Medicine 370 (18) 1712 - 1723.

Downloads

Published

24-03-2024

How to Cite

Li, H. (2024). Analysis of different detection methods for pulmonary tuberculosis. Transactions on Materials, Biotechnology and Life Sciences, 3, 206-212. https://doi.org/10.62051/s5fnzw35