Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Formulations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/fk4tqk84Keywords:
Tacrolimus; Efficacy; Safety; Comparison.Abstract
Tacrolimus (FK 506), a lipophilic 23-member macrolide lactone, is a potent calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppressive drug and primarily acts as acute antirejection maintenances after organ transplantation. Tacrolimus has narrow therapeutic index, large inter and intra patient variability in pharma-kinetics profile and poor oral availability due its poor solubility, which indicate hardships in determination of its optimum dose to patients. Interactions with P-glycoprotein also contributes to inconsistent therapeutic levels. There have been a lot of efforts made in different formulation of tacrolimus in order to balance between therapeutic failure and toxicity. However, generally the non-adherence to tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy has always been associated with adverse effects. This research investigates and compares the immediate-release (IR-Tac) and extended-release (ER-Tac) formulations, focusing on their impact on patient adherence, safety, and treatment efficacy. The results indicate that ER-Tac’s once-daily regimen improves adherence without compromising safety or efficacy, offering a promising alternative to the traditional twice-daily IR-Tac formulation.
Downloads
References
[1] M. Bonani, A. Balaphas, G. Bedino, et al. Adherence to, and patient convenience of, prolonged-release tacrolimus in stable kidney and liver transplant recipients after conversion from immediate-release tacrolimus in routine clinical practice in Switzerland, Swiss Medical Weekly 151 (2021) w20453.
[2] K. Yamashita, T. Nakate, K. Okimoto, et al. Establishment of new preparation method for solid dispersion formulation of tacrolimus. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 267(1) (2003) 79-91.
[3] B. K. Krämer, L. Albano, B. Banas, et al. Efficacy of prolonged-and immediate-release tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: a pooled analysis of two large, randomized, controlled trials, Transplantation Proceedings 49(9) (2017) 2040-2049.
[4] S. Beckebaum, S. Iacob, D. Sweid, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunosuppressant adherence in stable liver transplant patients converted from a twice‐daily tacrolimus‐based regimen to once‐daily tacrolimus extended‐release formulation, Transplant international 24(7) (2011) 666-675.
[5] L. Guirado, C. Cantarell, A. Franco, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Conversion from Twice-daily to Once-daily Tacrolimus in a Large Cohort of Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients, American Journal of Transplantation 11(9) (2011) 1965-1971.
[6] S. I. Min, J. Ha, H. G. Kang, et al. Conversion of Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy, American Journal of Transplantation 13(8) (2013) 2191-2197.
[7] P. Patel, H. Patel, S. Panchal, et al. Formulation strategies for drug delivery of tacrolimus: An overview, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation 2(4) (2012) 169-175.
[8] S. I. Min, J. Ha, H. G. Kang, et al. Conversion of twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus formulation in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients: pharmacokinetics and efficacy, American Journal of Transplantation 13(8) (2013) 2191-2197.
[9] K. I. Bzeizi, A. Albenmousa, A. M. Shawkat, et al. Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation, World Journal of Hepatology 13(3) (2021) 375.
[10] F. L. Weng, A. K. Israni, M. M. Joffe, et al. Race and Electronically Measured Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications after Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 16(6) (2005) 1839.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







