Detection of Nanoplastics Within Complex Environmental and Food Resources Matrices Via Machine Learning

Henry Jin

doi:10.62051/78e2m545

Authors

Henry Jin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/78e2m545

Keywords:

Nanoplastics, Raman Spectroscopy, Machine Learning, Support Vector Machine Classification.

Abstract

The pervasiveness of nanoplastics within the environment underscores the need for robust and accurate methods for their identification and classification. The lightweight and small nanoplastics (NPs) can bypass biological barriers and disperse throughout the environment, posing significant health risks to humans and aquatic life. Typical detection of nanoplastics has relied on cumbersome filtration, and subsequent coloration of the plastics for visualization, once they have been painstakingly separated from their matrix, including fish, sand, and soil using water. Raman spectroscopy, however, offers an alternative, as it effectively detects these particles without the need for separation, with its high resolution (<1µm). Unfortunately, accurate identification and classification are challenging because of the faint Raman scatter of NPs and signal interference from background noise. To address this challenge, this project proposes a method integrating machine learning (ML) with Raman spectroscopy. Multiple ML models were first trained with Raman spectra of 50μg/mL suspensions of PE, PTFE, PS, PMMA, and PVC NPs, and tested against validation data. While ML models achieved an average accuracy of >96%, the Support Vector Machine Classification model reached 99.58% accuracy in NP-identification. These ML models were then validated via analyses of NPs in water. In each case, the NPs were rapidly and successfully identified, while remaining in their glass bottle. The detection of NPs in water, this new Raman-ML model successfully detected as little as 1E5 particles/L, which surpasses new, published detection limits of only a few months ago.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] N. Ali, J. Katsouli, E. L. Marczylo, T. W. Gant, S. Wright, and J. Bernardino De La Serna, “The potential impacts of micro-and-nano plastics on various organ systems in humans,” eBioMedicine, vol. 99, p. 104901, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104901.

[2] S. Allen et al., “Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment,” Nat. Geosci., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 339–344, May 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0335-5.

[3] A. K. Baldwin, S. R. Corsi, and S. A. Mason, “Plastic Debris in 29 Great Lakes Tributaries: Relations to Watershed Attributes and Hydrology,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 10377–10385, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02917.

[4] F. Bessa et al., “Microplastics in gentoo penguins from the Antarctic region,” Sci. Rep., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 14191, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50621-2.

[5] H. Cai, M. Chen, Q. Chen, F. Du, J. Liu, and H. Shi, “Microplastic quantification affected by structure and pore size of filters,” Chemosphere, vol. 257, p. 127198, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127198.

[6] S. Lin et al., “Metabolomics Reveal Nanoplastic-Induced Mitochondrial Damage in Human Liver and Lung Cells,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 56, no. 17, pp. 12483–12493, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03980.

[7] D. M. Mitrano, P. Wick, and B. Nowack, “Placing nanoplastics in the context of global plastic pollution,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 491–500, May 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00888-2.

[8] M. A. Hafeez, M. Rashid, H. Tariq, Z. U. Abideen, S. S. Alotaibi, and M. H. Sinky, “Performance Improvement of Decision Tree: A Robust Classifier Using Tabu Search Algorithm,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 15, p. 6728, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11156728.

[9] A. Käppler et al., “Analysis of environmental microplastics by vibrational microspectroscopy: FTIR, Raman or both?,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem., vol. 408, no. 29, pp. 8377–8391, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9956-3.

[10] L. Xie et al., “Automatic Identification of Individual Nanoplastics by Raman Spectroscopy Based on Machine Learning,” Environ. Sci. Technol., p. acs.est.3c03210, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c03210.

[11] F. Yu and X. Hu, “Machine learning may accelerate the recognition and control of microplastic pollution: Future prospects,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 432, p. 128730, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128730.

[12] A. Tarafdar, S.-H. Choi, and J.-H. Kwon, “Differential staining lowers the false positive detection in a novel volumetric measurement technique of microplastics,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 432, p. 128755, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128755.

[13] N. Qian et al., “Rapid single-particle chemical imaging of nanoplastics by SRS microscopy,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 121, no. 3, p. e2300582121, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300582121.

[14] A. Muneer and S. M. Fati, “A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Cyberbullying Detection on Twitter,” Future Internet, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 187, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/fi12110187.

[15] Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, “A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 119–139, Aug. 1997, doi: 10.1006/jcss.1997.1504.

[16] V. N. Vapnik, “The Support Vector method,” in Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN’97, vol. 1327, W. Gerstner, A. Germond, M. Hasler, and J.-D. Nicoud, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1327. , Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997, pp. 261–271. doi: 10.1007/BFb0020166.

[17] Tin Kam Ho, “The random subspace method for constructing decision forests,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 832–844, Aug. 1998, doi: 10.1109/34.709601.

[18] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. H. Friedman, The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd ed. in Springer series in statistics. New York, NY: Springer, 2009.