Comprehensive Risk Assessment and Underwriting Investment Decision-Making Based on the EWM-TOPSIS Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/thzkve81Keywords:
EWM-TOPSIS; Risk Assessment; Insurance Underwriting.Abstract
The escalating frequency of extreme weather events poses a critical challenge for both property owners and insurers. Not only is property insurance becoming more costly, but it is also increasingly difficult to obtain. This article discusses how the best construction of the property insurance system to solve the profit crisis of the insurance company, The first task is to evaluate the serious weather in the area. Through search for related documents, the article determines the five remarkable features that describe serious weather events (temperature, precipitation, carbon dioxide concentration, humidity, air pressure), and then establish a risk evaluation system. In response to these indicators, use the EWM-TOPSIS method to evaluate 20 regions. The results of the K-MEANS cluster analysis are used to divide these areas into three categories: high risk, medium risk and low risk. By calculating the mathematical expectation of the insurance profit, it is expected to determine whether the area is worth investing, and put forward insurance pricing strategies in different risk areas, and develop insurance pricing models in different risk areas. Finally, two regions that have undergone two major weather events on different continents (Toronto in Canada and Queensland in Australia) use models to prove the feasibility of investment. The article also proposes that insurance owners can take some measures to affect the decision -making of insurance. Overall, through this model, it can help determine the areas that are most suitable for investment.
Downloads
References
[1] Hudson P, De Ruig L T, De Ruiter M C, et al. An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society[J]. Environmental Hazards, 2020, 19(3): 301-321.
[2] Don G ,Melanie F ,Edwina H , et al. Global Integrated Assessment Model: A New Analytical Tool to Assess Climate Change Risks and Policies [J]. Australian Commodities: Forecasts and Issues, 2008, 15 (1): 195-216.
[3] I. H ,S. A ,C. B S , et al. A reality check for the applicability of comprehensive climate risk assessment and management: Experiences from Peru, India and Austria [J]. Climate Risk Management, 2023, 41.
[4] Kati K ,Daniel O ,Christian H , et al. Insurance Against Extreme Weather Events: An Overview [J]. Review of Economics, 2021, 72 (2): 71-95.
[5] Neya T ,Yanon G ,Soubeiga J , et al. Climate Change Impact Assessment and Disaster Risk Financing Strategies in Mali: A Comprehensive Analysis of Drought and Flood Events [J]. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 2024, 14 (3): 126-138.
[6] S. J. H. . W. Z. G. Fu Shen Ming, Huang Ting Ting, Editorial: Observation characteristics and formation mechanisms of severe weather events, Frontiers in Earth Science 11 (2023).
[7] Jarzabkowski P, Chalkias K, Clarke D, et al. Insurance for climate adaptation: Opportunities and limitations[J]. 2019.
[8] Sun F, Yu J. Improved energy performance evaluating and ranking approach for office buildings using Simple-normalization, Entropy-based TOPSIS and K-means method[J]. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 1560-1570.
[9] Lucas C H, Booth K I, Garcia C. Insuring homes against extreme weather events: a systematic review of the research[J]. Climatic Change, 2021, 165(3-4): 61.
[10] Kousky C. Managing natural catastrophe risk: State insurance programs in the United States[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








