Powering the Future under Geopolitical Pressure-PV Industry Analysis for China and USA

Authors

  • Zijian Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/68az8172

Keywords:

Geopolitical Pressure-PV Industry; China; USA.

Abstract

This paper examines the current state of the photovoltaic (PV) industry, which is a significant contributor to global environmental protection efforts. The PV industry’s status is closely linked to environmental sustainability, one of the most pressing issues of our time. This study evaluates the current situation of PV panels, assesses potential risks to the industry’s stability, and proposes solutions to mitigate these threats. The analysis focuses on China and the USA due to their significant roles in the global PV market and their anticipated future influence. By examining the economic perspectives and geopolitical factors affecting the PV industry in these two countries, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current dynamics and future outlook. Government policies, including supply-side measures like tax incentives and demand-side initiatives such as feed-in tariffs, heavily influence China’s PV industry. Recent trends indicate a shift towards marketization and refinement. In contrast, the US PV industry is driven more by market-based demand-side policies and is significantly impacted by economic factors and geopolitical considerations, including trade protectionism aimed at safeguarding its new energy sector. Through this comparative analysis, the paper seeks to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each country’s approach, offering insights into how the global PV industry can navigate its challenges and continue to contribute to environmental sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

IEA. Executive summary: China currently dominates global solar PV supply chains. 2024.3.1, 2024.5.20, www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/executive-summary.

Solar Energy Technologies Office. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing Basics. Energy.Gov, 2024.3.10, 2024.5.19, www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-photovoltaic-manufacturing-basics.

Fthenakis, V. M., and P. D. Moskowitz. Photovoltaics: environmental, health and safety issues and perspectives. Progress in photovoltaics: research and applications, 2000, 8 (1), 27-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(200001/02)8:1<27::AID-PIP296>3.3.CO;2-#

Jordan, Philip G. Solar energy markets: An analysis of the global solar industry. Academic Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397174-6.00005-2

Rogers, John. Solar power on the rise: the technologies and policies behind a booming energy sector. Union of Concerned Scientists., 2014.

Vulturius, Gregor, and Heidi Tuhkanen. Matchmaking power: expanding climate finance for off-grid solar electricity. Stockholm Environment Institute., 2020.

Varnäs, Annika, et al. Executive Summary: Driving Technological Innovation for a Low-Carbon Society: Case Studies for Solar Photovoltaics and Carbon Capture and Storage, Stockholm Environment Institute, 2012, pp. 1–4.

Geeraerts, Gustaaf. Europe and China's Belt and Road Initiative: Growing Concerns, More Strategy. Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations, 2019.

Lincicome, Scott. Manufactured Crisis: “Deindustrialization,” Free Markets, and National Security. Cato Institute, 2021.

Lower, Milton D. The reindustrialization of America. Journal of Economic Issues, 1982, 16 (2), 629-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1982.11504023

Fuller, Jack, and Yang Guo. The Present Status of Solar Power Generation in the United States. The Journal of Energy and Development, 2016, 42 (1/2), 1-20.

Hove, Anders, et al. China’s Fossil-Fuel Heavy Development Path and Governance Model. Software versus Hardware: How China’s Institutional Setting Helps and Hinders the Clean Energy Transition, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2021, pp. 3–7.

Downloads

Published

21-08-2024

How to Cite

Zhang, Z. (2024). Powering the Future under Geopolitical Pressure-PV Industry Analysis for China and USA. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 9, 123-128. https://doi.org/10.62051/68az8172