Application Status and Practical Analysis of Surrogate Endpoints in Clinical Trial Design for Orphan Drugs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijphmr.v6n6.03Keywords:
Orphan Drugs, Rare Diseases, Clinical Trials, Surrogate Endpoints, Conditional Approval, BiomarkersAbstract
Rare diseases are characterized by high heterogeneity, small patient populations and wide geographic dispersion. Clinical trials of orphan drugs generally face problems such as recruitment difficulties, long follow-up, and difficulty in evaluating traditional endpoints. Surrogate endpoints can indirectly predict clinical benefits and have become an important research tool for the design of clinical trials for rare disease drugs. This article refers to the accelerated approval rules of the US FDA, the conditional marketing authorization system of the EU EMA, and the relevant guidelines for clinical research and development of rare disease drugs in China. It systematically sorts out the regulatory norms and application system of surrogate endpoints, analyzes their implementation points, practical shortcomings, and potential safety risks in clinical trial design. Research has found that surrogate endpoints can effectively break through the experimental bottleneck of orphan drug development, but there are still many problems in indicator validation standards, practical application, and risk management. Based on the current situation of domestic research and development, this paper proposes targeted optimization strategies to provide practical references for the design of orphan drug trials, regulatory review, and clinical research in China. These strategies can not only accelerate the market entry of orphan drugs, but also keep clinical medication safety as a top priority.
References
[1] Nguengang Wakap, S., Lambert, D. M., Olry, A., Rodwell, C., Gueydan, C., Lanneau, V., ... & Rath, A. (2020). Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. European Journal of Human Genetics, 28(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0
[2] Pizzamiglio, C., Vernon, H. J., Hanna, M. G., & Pitceathly, R. D. (2022). Designing clinical trials for rare diseases: unique challenges and opportunities. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00013-9
[3] Ciani, O., Manyara, A. M., Davies, P., Stewart, D., Weir, C. J., Young, A. E., ... & Taylor, R. S. (2023). A framework for the definition and interpretation of the use of surrogate endpoints in interventional trials. EClinicalMedicine, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102292
[4] Waisbren, S. E., Noel, K., Fahrbach, K., Cella, C., Frame, D., Dorenbaum, A., & Levy, H. (2007). Phenylalanine blood levels and clinical outcomes in phenylketonuria: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 92(1–2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.05.002
[5] Burzykowski, T., Molenberghs, G., & Buyse, M. (Eds.). (2005). The evaluation of surrogate endpoints. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25145-2
[6] Pease, A. M., Krumholz, H. M., Downing, N. S., Aminawung, J. A., Shah, N. D., & Ross, J. S. (2017). Postapproval studies of drugs initially approved by the FDA on the basis of limited evidence: systematic review. BMJ, 357. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2780
[7] Manyara, A. M., Davies, P., Stewart, D., Weir, C. J., Young, A. E., Blazeby, J., ... & Ciani, O. (2024). Reporting of surrogate endpoints in randomised controlled trial protocols (SPIRIT-Surrogate): extension checklist with explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 386. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-077335
[8] Gagne, J. J., Thompson, L., O’Keefe, K., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2014). Innovative research methods for studying treatments for rare diseases: methodological review. BMJ, 349. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6802
[9] Gyawali, B., Rome, B. N., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2021). Regulatory and clinical consequences of negative confirmatory trials of accelerated approval cancer drugs: retrospective observational study. BMJ, 374. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1659
[10] Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
[11] Sun, W., Zheng, W., & Simeonov, A. (2017). Drug discovery and development for rare genetic disorders. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 173(9), 2307–2322. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38325
[12] Rupp, T., & Zuckerman, D. (2017). Quality of life, overall survival, and costs of cancer drugs approved based on surrogate endpoints. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(2), 276–277. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7627
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Public Health and Medical Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







