Factors Influencing Rehabilitation Behavior in Stroke Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijphmr.v4n3.08Keywords:
Stroke, Rehabilitation behaviors, Qualitative interviews, CFIR frameworkAbstract
Background: Stroke has high incidence and disability rates; rehabilitation is key to reducing disability and improving quality of life. This study identifies factors influencing rehabilitation behavior, supporting the development of personalized plans. Methods: This study identified stroke rehabilitation factors using the CFIR and created a questionnaire for follow-up analysis. Results: Qualitative interviews identified multiple barriers and facilitators across CFIR domains: patients (13 each, 5 domains), caregivers (14 barriers, 15 facilitators, 5 domains), and healthcare workers (14 barriers, 12 facilitators, 4–5 domains).Factor analyses of the questionnaires revealed levels of pain or discomfort (P=0.017), annoyance with daily activities (P=0.007), annoyance with social interaction (P=0.015), understanding of healthcare staff's explanations of the condition (P=0.046), accurate understanding of post-stroke rehabilitation (P=0.024), and the individual's sense of identification with the organization (P=0.003). (P=0.003) were associated with rehabilitation behavior. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: This study used interviews and questionnaires to identify key factors influencing stroke patients’ and caregivers’ rehabilitation behaviors, highlighting links between behavior, context, and individual traits to support personalized rehabilitation.
References
[1] Myint PK, Sinha S, Luben RN, et al. Risk factors for first-ever stroke in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population-based study. European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation: official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology 2008; 15(6):663-9. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32830fe465 [published Online First: 2008/09/10].
[2] Ornello R, Degan D, Tiseo C, et al. Distribution and Temporal Trends From 1993 to 2015 of Ischemic Stroke Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke 2018; 49(4):814-19. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.020031 [published Online First: 2018/03/15].
[3] Wang W, Jiang B, Sun H, et al. Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China: Results from a Nationwide Population-Based Survey of 480 687 Adults. Circulation 2017; 135(8):759-71. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.025250 [published Online First: 2017/01/06].
[4] Boursin P, Paternotte S, Dercy B, et al. [Semantics, epidemiology and semiology of stroke]. Soins; la revue de reference infirmiere 2018; 63(828):24-27. doi: 10.1016/j.soin.2018.06.008 [published Online First: 2018/09/15].
[5] Tyagi S, Luo N, Tan CS, et al. Seeking healthcare services post-stroke: a qualitative descriptive study exploring family caregiver and stroke survivor perspectives in an asian setting. BMC neurology 2021; 21(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02463-7 [published Online First: 2021/11/07].
[6] Koh JSG, Hill AM, Hill KD, et al. Evaluating a Novel Multifactorial Falls Prevention Activity Programme for Community-Dwelling Older People After Stroke: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study. Clinical interventions in aging 2020; 15:1099-112. doi: 10.2147/cia.S251516 [published Online First: 2020/08/09].
[7] Malik AN, Tariq H, Afridi A, et al. Technological advancements in stroke rehabilitation. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 2022; 72(8):1672-74. doi: 10.47391/jpma.22-90 [published Online First: 2022/10/26].
[8] Barthels D, Das H. Current advances in ischemic stroke research and therapies. Biochimica et biophysica acta Molecular basis of disease 2020; 1866(4):165260. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.09.012 [published Online First: 2018/09/15].
[9] Wei WE, De Silva DA, Chang HM, et al. Post-stroke patients with moderate function have the greatest risk of falls: a National Cohort Study. BMC geriatrics 2019; 19(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1377-7 [published Online First: 2019/12/28].
[10] Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. The Lancet Neurology 2006; 5(7):603-12. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70495-1 [published Online First: 2006/06/20].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Public Health and Medical Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







