Greenhouse Gas Emission Monitoring: Technologies, Challenges and Future Development

Yongkang Zhen

doi:10.62051/

Authors

Yongkang Zhen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/

Keywords:

Greenhouse gas emission; Emission monitoring; Monitoring technology; Carbon neutrality; Climate change.

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission monitoring is a core link in global carbon neutrality and climate change response, which provides accurate data support for emission accounting, policy formulation and emission reduction effect evaluation. This paper systematically elaborates the main technical systems of greenhouse gas emission monitoring, including ground-based in-situ monitoring, remote sensing monitoring and mobile monitoring technologies, and analyzes the technical characteristics, application scope and accuracy of different monitoring methods. On this basis, the key challenges faced by current GHG emission monitoring are discussed, such as the low monitoring accuracy of small and medium-sized emission sources, the high cost of long-term continuous monitoring, the insufficient integration of multi-source monitoring data and the lack of unified global monitoring standards. Finally, the future development trends of GHG emission monitoring technology are prospected, including the miniaturization and intellectualization of monitoring equipment, the networking of monitoring stations, the high precision of remote sensing monitoring and the construction of global unified monitoring data platforms. This study aims to provide theoretical and technical references for the optimization and improvement of greenhouse gas emission monitoring systems in various countries.

References

[1] Stott P.A, Christidis N, Otto F.E.L, Sun Y, Vanderlinden J.-P, van Oldenborgh, G.J, Vautard, R, von Storch H, Walton P, Yiou P and Zwiers, F.W. “Attribution of extreme weather and climate-related events”, WIREs Climate Change, Vol. 7, pp. 23-41, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.380

[2] Schleussner CF, Castro P, Lesnikowski A. “Expert retrospective on a decade of the Paris Agreement”, Nature Climate Change, Vol. 15, pp. 1136-1140, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02477-w

[3] Schuetze C, Lau S, Reiche N, Ködel U. “Ground-based Remote Sensing with Open-path Fourier-transform Infrared (OP-FTIR) Spectroscopy for Large-scale Monitoring of Greenhouse Gases”, Energy Procedia, Vol. 37, pp. 4276–4282, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.330

[4] Palmer P. I, & Miller, S. D. “Determining maximum entropy in 3D remote sensing height distributions and using it to improve aboveground biomass modelling via stratification”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 260, pp. 112464, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112464

[5] Albertson J.D, Harvey T, Foderaro G, Zhu P, Zhou X, Ferrari S, Amin M.S, Modrak M. “A Mobile Sensing Approach for Regional Surveillance of Fugitive Methane Emissions in Oil and Gas Production”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, No.5, pp. 2487-2497, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05059

[6] Ciais P, Sabine C, & Bala, G. “Challenges in greenhouse gas emission monitoring for small and medium-sized sources”, Nature Climate Change, Vol. 13, pp. 203-212, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42308

[7] Karoff C, Vara-Vela AL, Eikeland AZ, Knudsen J, Cappelluti F, Stoltenberg ML, Alberti RCA, Engedal ASB. “Remote Sensing for Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions at Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage Facilities: A Review”, Remote Sensing, Vol. 17, pp. 3707, 2025 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223707

[8] Nazemi Haleh, Aashish Joseph, Jaewoo Park, Arezoo Emadi. “Advanced Micro- and Nano-Gas Sensor Technology: A Review”, Sensors, Vol. 19, pp. 1285, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061285

[9] Li J, Li P, Han P. “Advances in the design of urban CO2 emission monitoring networks: a review”, Carbon Research, Vol. 5, pp. 3, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-025-00239-z

[10] Red Willow Coleman, Andrew K, Thorpe, Philip G, Brodrick, Adam Chlus, Jay E, Fahlen, Brian Bue, John Chapman, Regina F. “Identifying and quantifying greenhouse gas emissions with the AVIRIS-3 airborne imaging spectrometer”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 332, pp. 115058, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.115058

[11] Hu L, Hu X, Jiang F, He W, Deng Z, Fang S, Fang X. “Analysis of Regional Surface CO2 Fluxes Using the MEGA Satellite Data Assimilation System”, Remote Sensing, Vol. 17, pp. 3720, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223720

[12] Dogniaux M, Maasakkers J.D, Girard M. “Global satellite survey reveals uncertainty in landfill methane emissions”, Nature, Vol. 647, pp. 397-402, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09683-8