Prediction of Gas Emission in Mining Face Based on GRA-ISA-LSSVM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v5n2.18Keywords:
Gas emission prediction; Grey Relational Analysis; GRA-ISA-LSSVM.Abstract
Coal, as a crucial primary energy source in China, provides a stable energy supply and security for the nation's economic and sustainable high-quality development. However, gas disasters can lead to severe casualties and significant economic losses. Therefore, accurately and efficiently predicting gas emission is of paramount importance and holds significant practical value for the safe production of high-gas mines. This paper employs the Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM) model, which offers better regression prediction accuracy for nonlinear problems with small datasets. To enhance the model's prediction accuracy and effectiveness, the Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) method is used to analyze the influencing factors of gas emission. Factors with high correlation are selected as model inputs. Experimental results show that coal seam gas content, coal seam depth, coal seam thickness, adjacent seam gas content, adjacent seam spacing, mining face length, and adjacent seam thickness have high correlation. To validate the results, Kendall's tau-b, Pearson, and Spearman correlation analysis methods are used, and the experimental results align with GRA. Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Improved Simulated Annealing Algorithm (ISA) are employed to find the global optimal solution for the LSSVM model parameters. Finally, the GRA-GA-LSSVM, GRA-PSO-LSSVM, and GRA-ISA-LSSVM models are constructed and tested. Experimental results show that after applying GRA, the RMSE and MAE metrics decrease, while the R² metric increases, proving that the GRA method optimizes the model. The GRA-ISA-LSSVM model has the lowest RMSE and MAE values and the highest R² value, indicating superior performance in static gas emission prediction.
References
[1] R D. Prediction of gas emission from longwall faces[J]. Mining Engineering, 1981(140): 565-572.
[2] W L L L. Gas emission prediction and recovery in underground coal mines[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1998, (1-4)(35): 117-145.
[3] K. N. Control of gas emissions in underground coal mines[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1998,(1-4)(35): 57-82.
[4] KARACAN C Ö O R A G. Geostatistical modeling of the gas emission zone and its in-place gas content for Pittsburgh seam mines using sequential gaussian simulation[J]. International Journal of Coal, 2012(90): 50-71.
[5] M A E. Gas emission from broken coal. An experimental and theoretical investigation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1968,6(5): 475-494.
[6] DINGWEN D. Mine Gas Emission Prediction based on Gaussian Process Model[J]. [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012(45): 334-338.
[7] PAN YUMIN D Y Z Q. Dynamic prediction of gas emission based on wavelet neural network toolbox[J]. [J]. Journal of Coal Science and Engineering, 2013,02(19): 174-181.
[8] LU GUOBIN K J B G. Application of PCA-BP to gas emission prediction of mining working face[J]. [J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2015,12(34): 1329-1334.
[9] FENG YUXI Z K Y X. Prediction for Gas Emission Quantity of the Working Face Based on LSSVM Optimized by Improved Particle Swarm Optimization[J]. [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014(1051): 1028-1031.
[10] Fu Hua, Xie Sen, Xu Yaosong, Chen Zichun. Research on dynamic prediction model of coal mine gas emission based on ACC-ENN algorithm [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(07): 1296-1301.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xiong Huang, Changsheng Shi, Yuepeng Yan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







