Impacts of the U.S.-China Trade War on Lithium-ion Battery Supply Chains: A Network Analysis Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v5n2.38Keywords:
U.S.-China Trade War, Complex Network Analysis, Lithium, Lithium-ion BatteriesAbstract
Lithium is a critical strategic resource essential for electric vehicles and lithium-ion batteries, both of which play pivotal roles in the transition to renewable energy. This study examines the global lithium supply chain, analyzing four representative products—lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium-ion batteries, and electric vehicles—across the upstream, midstream, and downstream sectors from 2012 to 2023. Utilizing complex network theory, the research explores the structural characteristics and dynamic evolution of global trade networks before and after the U.S.-China trade war. The findings reveal that the lithium supply chain exhibits strong small-world characteristics, with high clustering coefficients and relatively short path lengths across all stages. Differences in trade network patterns were observed between products: lithium hydroxide shows more regional concentration, while electric vehicles demonstrate a more globalized trade network. These insights offer important implications for understanding supply chain resilience and vulnerability in the face of geopolitical conflict.
Downloads
References
[1] Urata, S. (2019). Japan-US trade frictions: The past, the present and implications for China-US trade wars. Mimeo, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
[2] Kan, P. H. (2020). How US-China trade friction affects market opening in China: a comparative analysis between US-Japan and US-China trade friction (Doctoral dissertation).
[3] Wolf, M., & Kalish, I. (2021). Supply chain resilience in the face of geopolitical risks. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/economy/us-china-trade-war-supply-chain.html
[4] Fajgelbaum, P., Goldberg, P., Kennedy, P., Khandelwal, A., & Taglioni, D. (2024). The US-China trade war and global reallocations. American Economic Review: Insights, 6(2), 295-312.
[5] Feng, P., Zhou, X., Zhang, D., Chen, Z., & Wang, S. (2022). The impact of trade policy on global supply chain network equilibrium: A new perspective of product-market chain competition. Omega, 109, 102612.
[6] Guo, S., Zhao, L., & Xu, X. (2016). Impact of supply risks on procurement decisions. Annals of Operations Research, 241(1), 411–430.
[7] Hermoso-Orzáez, M. J., Orejón-Sánchez, R. D., & Gago-Calderón, A. (2020). Analysis and risk management in projects of change to LED in street lighting according to ISO 21500 and UNE-EN 62198. In J. L. Ayuso Muñoz, J. L. Yagüe Blanco, & S. F. Capuz-Rizo (Eds.), Project management and engineering research, pp. 405–424. Springer, Cham.
[8] Hermoso-Orzáez, M. J., & Garzón-Moreno, J. (2022). Risk management methodology in the supply chain: a case study applied. Annals of Operations Research, 313(2), 1051-1075.
[9] Gao, H. (2021). The history and present of Japan-U.S. trade friction. China Social Sciences Publishing House.
[10] Shen, J., & Gao, L. (2024). National Development and Reform Commission: China's new energy vehicle production and sales rank first globally for 9 consecutive years. People's Daily Online. http://finance.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0118/c1004-40161886.html
[11] Wang, Y., Lin, S., & Li, B. (2022). Risk management in supply chain: The HAZOP analysis. Supply Chain Management, 3(2), 56-65.
[12] Li, B. (2017). Analysis of the prospects of the lithium hydroxide industry. Salt Lake Research, (03), 81-86.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







