Research on the Current Situation and Countermeasures of State owned Assets Management in Administrative Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v5n2.24Keywords:
Resource Value Theory, Property Rights Theory, State-owned Asset ResourcesAbstract
As a socialist country with a dominant public ownership system, the core status of public ownership is significantly reflected in the State's control and guidance over the key sectors of the national economy. As the representative of all citizens in the country, the State is the sole owner of state-owned assets. Therefore, effective management of state-owned assets is an objective necessity to promote the development of the national economy and a necessary requirement to maintain the basic economic system of the country. The core task of the audit agency is to ensure the transparency, compliance, and maximum efficiency of fiscal and financial spending, thereby implementing comprehensive and effective supervision. In this process, auditing the state-owned assets of administrative and public institutions is an indispensable part. This paper analyzes the weak links and causes of the management of state-owned assets in municipal administrative and public institutions in Yibin City based on the special audit process of municipal state-owned assets. Using resource value theory and property rights theory, the study finds that the management of state-owned assets in municipal administrative and public institutions is characterized by weak foundation management, unregulated lease management, inadequate use management, and low efficiency in project property rights processing. In order to enhance the management efficiency of state-owned assets by administrative and public institutions, each unit should: 1. Strengthen the professionalism and capabilities of managers; 2. Establish a sound system of state-owned asset management; 3. Optimize the allocation of state-owned asset management; 4. Clarify the scope of state-owned asset management; and 5. Improve the information management of state-owned assets.
Downloads
References
[1] Zheng Yongqin. Reflections on the Management System of Administrative State owned Assets in China [J]. Journal of Fujian Finance and Accounting Management Cadre College, 2005 (02): 15-16.
[2] Wen Zongyu. Building a new administrative state-owned asset management system [J]. Administrative Assets and Finance, 2006 (02): 21-24.
[3] Han Ping. On the Reform of Administrative State owned Assets Management System [J]. China Foreign Investment, 2013 (13): 49-71.
[4] Zhu Pengfei Discussion on the Management System of State owned Assets in Chinese Public Institutions [D]. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2015.
[5] Song Junfa, Guo Min. Management of Administrative State owned Assets: Value Preservation and Path Selection [J]. China Management Informatization, 2012, 15 (04): 11-12.
[6] Liu Jiali, Xie Di. Review, Reflection, and Prospect of Western Public Goods Theory - Also on the Privatization of Public Goods and Government Regulatory Reform in China [J] Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business, 2015, 36 (05): 11-17.
[7] Xu Fengjun. Exploration of the Supervision System of Administrative State owned Assets by the National People's Congress [J]. Qilu Zhutan, 2020 (03): 10-12.
[8] Tan Jing, Li Yanzhi. Design of Performance Evaluation Index System for Administrative State owned Assets Management [J]. Economic Research Reference, 2015 (33): 25-40.
[9] Ding Zengqi. Performance Evaluation Analysis of Administrative State owned Assets Management [J]. Building Materials and Decoration, 2016 (14): 232-233.
[10] Lin Su'e. Analysis of Performance Evaluation of Administrative State owned Assets Management [J]. Modern Economic Information, 2016 (22): 203.
[11] David Arthur Shand Toward a Theory of property rights [J]. American Economic Review 2009(57):78-114.
[12] ColinV Balmer. Diversw property rights, institutions and decentralisation:Forest management by village forest councils in Uttarakhand [J]. Policy and Society, 2008(32):43-59.
[13] Hculli Arnold. A comparative analysis of the effects of institutional property rights on forest livelihoods and forest conditions:Evidence from Germany [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2010(38):178-190.
[14] Shirley Jen. UBC's Proposed Online Infrastructure Asset Management Graduate Course [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 112(2): 241-255.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







