The Construction of Preventive Administrative Public Interest Litigation

Ting Hu

doi:10.62051/ijgem.v4n2.61

Authors

Ting Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n2.61

Keywords:

Preventive administrative public interest litigation, Public interest, Objective litigation, Legal supervision

Abstract

The current administrative public interest litigation system has insurmountable limitations in terms of the scope of the case, the main body of the prosecution, and there are limitations in the functions of the procuratorate and the formation of a highly interconnected model, and it is difficult to comprehensively safeguard the public interest in the post-facto mode of relief. Therefore, the need for administrative public interest litigation system adjustment, the construction of preventive administrative public interest litigation. The implementation of preventive administrative public interest litigation needs to have mature theoretical support and meet the current needs of reality. The construction of preventive administrative public-interest litigation begins with defining the scope of the case, clarifying the main body of the prosecution, expanding the functions of the procuratorate, and setting up a system of travelling public-interest litigation prosecutors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Xiangwen Kong, Ding Wang, Jiming Wang. Research Report on the Pilot Work of Administrative Public Interest Litigation Initiated by Procuratorial Organs. Studies in Administrative Law. 2017, No. 5.

[2] Zhihong Gao. Three Directions for Optimizing the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System. Series on Politics and Law. 2022, No. 1.

[3] Hui Qin. An Empirical Examination of Administrative Public Interest Litigation Initiated by Procuratorial Organs. Studies in Administrative Law. 2019, No. 3.

[4] Xinli Zhu, Mingliang Tang. Developmental Study of Modern Modes of Administrative Activity. Chinese Law Journal. 2007, No. 2.

[5] Youyong Zhou. The Abuse of Authority Standard in Judicial Review - An Observation of the Supreme People's Court Gazette Cases. Juridical Studies. 2020, No. 1.

[6] Hongfei Liang. Preventive Administrative Public Interest Litigation: Towards “Process Regulation” Administrative Law Supervision. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition). 2020, No. 1.

[7] Kai Tian. Study on the Legislation on Public Interest Litigation Initiated by the People's Procuratorate. China Procuratorate Press, 2017, p.63.

[8] Xuejun Hu. A Restatement of the Nature of the Burden of Proof Regime. Juridical Studies. 2020, No. 5.

[9] Lian Zhou. Local Governments in Transition: Officials' Incentives and Governance. Gezi Press, 2017, p.363.

[10] Hongfei Liang. A Jurisprudential Review of Administrative Public Interest Litigation in China. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition). 2017, No. 7.

[11] Hongfei Liang. Preventive Administrative Public Interest Litigation: Toward “Process Regulation” Administrative Law Supervision. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition). 2020, No. 4.

[12] Lian Zhou. Local Governments in Transition: Officials' Incentives and Governance. Gezi Press, 2017, p.363.

[13] Lihong Lin. Re-examination of the Institutional Space for Civil Public Interest Litigation by Procuratorial Organs, and Comparison with the Scope of Administrative Public Interest Litigation. Studies in Administrative Law. 2022, No. 2.

[14] [Portugal] José Manuel Ribeiro Servulo Correa. Principles of Administrative Law. Translated by Wenzhuang Feng. Beijing Law Press, 2017, p.125.

[15] Mingchao Li, Jiayue Wang. An Examination of the Effectiveness of the Operation of the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System: An Analysis of 713 Decision Documents as a Sample. Times Law Journal. 2020, No. 3.

[16] Zhihong Gao. Three Directions for Optimizing the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System. Series on Politics and Law. 2022, No. 1.

[17] Jiawei Gao. Theoretical Foundations of Prosecutorial Administrative Public Interest Litigation. Journal of the State Prosecutor's Academy. 2017, No. 2.

[18] Chunye Wang. The Necessity of Constructing a Legal Normative System for Independent Administrative Public Interest Litigation. Law in China and Abroad. 2022, No. 1.

[19] Zhiyong Xie. The scope of public interest litigation should not be too narrow. The People's Prosecutor. 2015, No. 14.

[20] [U.S.] Richard B. Stewart. Reconstructing Administrative Law in the United States. Translated by Kui Shen. The Commercial Press, Ltd, 2011, p.179.

[21] Jianguo Tao. Germany's Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation System and Its Implications for China. German Studies. 2013, No. 2.

[22] Baoying Guan. Study on Prosecutorial Intervention in Administrative Discretion in Administrative Public Interest Litigation. Modern Jurisprudence. 2020, No. 1.

[23] Xuexian Huang. The Expert Support Person System in Administrative Proceedings and Its Improvement. Jurisprudence. 2008, No. 9.

[24] Yuan Zhang. A Practical Review and Theoretical Reflection on the Criteria for Judging Illegal Administrative Acts in Administrative Public Interest Litigations: An Examination of 1,021 Samples of Judgments. Studies in Administrative Law. 2022, No. 2.