On the Regulation of Technology Transfer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v4n2.23Keywords:
Forced technology transfer, International trade disputes, Intellectual property protection, Technology transfer legal framework, Fair competitionAbstract
This paper explores the legal controversies and regulatory issues of forced technology transfer (FTT) in international trade, analyzing its stipulations under international law, the balance between intellectual property protection and technology transfer obligations, interpretations of relevant provisions in WTO and other international agreements, and the differences and conflicts in China's legal definitions of technology transfer. Through empirical analyses of WTO dispute cases such as DS603, DS611, and DS615, the study reveals the complexity and diversity of technology transfer in international trade, and proposes specific measures and recommendations for building a fair legal framework for technology transfer. These measures aim to strengthen intellectual property protection while promoting the free flow and development of technology, providing a balanced legal solution for technology circulation in international trade.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang, T. (2023). Research on the Prohibition Clauses of Technology Transfer Performance Requirements in the China-EU Comprehensive Investment Agreement. Thesis of Shandong University, 53.
[2] Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. (2020). Technology transfer, climate change mitigation, and environmental patent impact on sustainability and economic growth: A comparison of European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150:119770.
[3] Hoen, E. T. (2022). Protecting public health through technology transfer: the unfulfilled promise of the TRIPS agreement. Health and Human Rights, 24(2): 211.
[4] Lewis, J. A. (2019). Emerging technologies and managing the risk of tech transfer to China. Center for Strategic & International Studies.
[5] Zheng, G. (2024). Research on the Issues of Forced Technology Transfer from the Perspective of International Investment Law. Thesis of Guangxi University, 71.
[6] Xu, Y. (2019). China's National People's Congress Standing Committee Promulgates the Foreign Investment Law Prohibiting Forced Technology Transfer. Technology Law Review, 31(4): 2-4.
[7] Mengdi, Z. (2019). China-US Phase One Agreement: The End of Technology Transfer Debate? Tsinghua China Law Review, 12: 365.
[8] Chen, A. W., Chen, J., & Dondeti, V. R. (2020). The US-China trade war: dominance of trade or technology? Applied Economics Letters, 27(11): 904-909.
[9] Prud'homme, D., & von Zedtwitz, M. (2019). Managing “forced” technology transfer in emerging markets: The case of China. Journal of International Management, 25(3): 100670.
[10] Yin, Q. (2022). Forced technology transfer performance requirement in international investment agreements—a Chinese perspective. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 17(2): 114-131.
[11] Qin, J. Y. (2019). Forced technology transfer and the US–China trade war: Implications for international economic law. Journal of International Economic Law, 22(4): 743-762.
[12] García-Revillo, M. (2020). International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 31(1), 276-279.
[13] Liu, Y. (2024). Research on the Problems and Improvements of China’s International Technology Transfer Legal System. Thesis of Jilin University, 62
[14] Svetlicinii, A., & Xie, F. (2024). The anti-suit injunctions in patent litigation in China: what role for judicial self-restraint? Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, jpae049.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
