Study on the Financial Performance of the Cruise Industry Based on Entropy TOPSIS Method

Authors

  • Yuechen Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v3n2.34

Keywords:

Cruise industry, Financial performance, Sustainable development

Abstract

In recent years, the global cruise industry, having grown substantially and contributed notably to the world economy, has seen its operations and profitability directly impacted by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, the present study was conducted to analyse the financial performance of the global cruise industry and to understand the development trend of the cruise tourism industry. Focusing on the three major cruise companies dominating nearly 80% of the global cruise industry market share from 2017-2023, the entropy TOPSIS method was hereby adopted to evaluate and compare their financial performance across four key dimensions, including solvency, operating ability, profitability and development ability. By determining the relative weights of these financial indicators, the paper systematically ranked the performance of each cruise company in these critical areas. The study found that the COVID-19 pandemic led to a substantial decline in the financial performance of the cruise industry. Among the companies analysed, Carnival Group (CCL) demonstrated relatively strong overall performance. In contrast, Royal Caribbean (RCL) and Norwegian Group (NCLH) exhibited distinct strengths and weaknesses across various financial aspects. In addition, grounded in the outcomes, recommendations were proposed for cruise business operators in terms of fleet optimisation, shareholder welfare, and cost hedging strategies. These suggestions aimed to strengthen the resilience and risk tolerance of the cruise industry and to achieve the sustainable development of the cruise industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lin, L. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Lee, J. Y. (2022). A study on the trends of the global cruise tourism industry, sustainable development, and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(11), 6890.

Suciani, T. Y., & Setyawan, S. (2022). ANALYSIS OF CASH FLOW STATEMENT TO ASSESS THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AT PT ASTRA INTERNATIONAL TBK. CASHFLOW: Current Advanced Research on Sharia Finance and Economic Worldwide, 1(4), 1-12.

Wang, Y. J., & Lee, H. S. (2010). Evaluating financial performance of Taiwan container shipping companies by strength and weakness indices. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 87(1), 38-52.

Kang, H. W., Wang, G. W., Bang, H. S., & Woo, S. H. (2016). Economic performance and corporate financial management of shipping firms. Maritime economics & logistics, 18, 317-330.

Satta, G., Avallone, F., Persico, L., Parola, F., Vitellaro, F., & Di Fabio, C. (2023). M& As and determinants of financial multiples in shipping: the European ro-pax and ferry market. Maritime Policy & Management, 1-23.

Kouspos, A., Panayides, P. M., & Tsouknidis, D. A. (2023). Chartering contracts and financial performance of US listed shipping firms. Maritime Policy & Management, 1-15.

Diakomihalis, M., & Papadopoulou, G. (2018). Economic crisis and Greek cruise sector financial analysis. tourismos, 13(2), 87-103.

Syriopoulos, T., Tsatsaronis, M., & Gorila, M. (2022). The global cruise industry: Financial performance evaluation. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 45, 100558.

Konstantinos A. Chrysafis, Georgia C. Papadopoulou, Ioannis N. Theotokas. (2024). Measuring financial performance through operating business efficiency in the global cruise industry: A fuzzy benchmarking study on the “big three”, Tourism Management, 100, 0261-5177.

Cruise Market Watch. 2024. “2024 Worldwide Cruise Line Market Share Statistics.” Cruise Market Watch. Accessed 13 March 2024. https://cruisemarketwatch.com/market-share/

Downloads

Published

28-06-2024

Issue

Section

Arcicles

How to Cite

Wu, Y. (2024). Study on the Financial Performance of the Cruise Industry Based on Entropy TOPSIS Method. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 3(2), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v3n2.34