The Enabling Role of Digital Technology for Rural Revitalization

QCA Study Based on Digitization Index of 58 Counties in Anhui Province

Authors

  • Ji Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v3n2.11

Keywords:

Local digital governance, Multi-level governance, QCA, Rural revitalization

Abstract

As part of the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity, the local digital governance model is still in the exploratory stage, and there is an urgent need for academics to clarify whether digital technology can, to a certain extent, empower rural economic development and promote rural revitalization. Taking 58 counties in Anhui Province as the research object, this study adopts a multilevel governance theoretical perspective and the QCA method to identify the realization paths of high digital governance levels. It is found that (1) none of the single antecedent conditions can individually constitute a necessary condition for the improvement of county economic development level (high quality development of county economy). (2) The grouping analysis reveals that there is a common path to promote the improvement of county economic development level, i.e., the digital village grouping consisting of digital infrastructure, digital governance, and digital life. The findings of the study help deepen the rational understanding of the government and localities on digital governance, provide practical insights on digital governance in counties in China, and propose a path to optimize digital empowerment for rural revitalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zeng Yiwu, Song Yixiang, Lin Xiazhen, Fu Changluan. Ruminations on some issues of digital village construction in China [J]. China Rural Economy, 2021, (04): 21-35.

Jian Zhaoquan, Deng Lingyun, Li Huiquan. A study on the consensus formation mechanism of technological foresight in the context of digital governance [J]. Science and Science and Technology Management, 2022, 43(12): 46-56.

He Yanling, Wang Zheng. Unified governance: party building leads social governance and its redefinition of network governance [J]. Management World, 2022, 38(05): 115-31.

Li Chongzhao, Huang Juan. Policy and governance structure of data governance in UK government [J]. E-Government, 2019, (01): 20-31.

NEO S, GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN S, TUMMERS L. Core values for ideal civil servants: service-oriented, responsive and dedicated [J]. Public Administration Review, 2023.

STIVERS C. Seeing the water: three great books for contemporary public administration [J]. Public Administration, 2022, 100(1): 161-8.

RAGIN. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond [M]. 2008.

Du Yunzhou, Liu Qiuchen, Cheng Jianqing. What kind of business environment ecology generates high entrepreneurial activity in cities? --An analysis based on institutional grouping [J]. Management World, 2020, 36(09): 141-55.

Downloads

Published

28-06-2024

Issue

Section

Arcicles

How to Cite

Wu, J. (2024). The Enabling Role of Digital Technology for Rural Revitalization: QCA Study Based on Digitization Index of 58 Counties in Anhui Province. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 3(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v3n2.11