The fluency of human-robot collaboration based on human-robot fit

Authors

  • Qi Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/IJGEM.v2n3.39

Keywords:

Person-environment fit theory, HRC fluency, Human-robot fit

Abstract

As an important working mode of current manufacturing enterprises, human-robot collaboration (HRC) is of great significance for enterprises to improve production efficiency and quality. However, unfortunately, there are still some problems in the practice of HRC, such as lack of fluency and low quality of HRC, which limit the positive role of HRC in manufacturing enterprises. Therefore, it is of great significance to study and reveal the influencing factors and formation mechanism of HRC fluency for further exerting the positive role of HRC and managing HRC in a targeted way. Building upon a review and analysis of existing literature, this study innovatively explores the formation process of human-robot collaboration fluence based on the theory of person-environment fit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Li Xian guo, Zheng Chenyu. A Study on the Impact Mechanism of the Anthropomorphism of Service Robots on Customer Diversified Behavior. Industrial Technology and Economy, 2021, 40(05): 130-137. (in Chinese).

Ma Li, Xu Zongwei. A Study on Boundary Management and Work-Family Interface Based on the Person-Environment Fit Theory. Nankai Management Review, 2011, 14(05): 41-47+152. (in Chinese).

Wang Zhenyuan, Yao Minghui. A Review of the Impact of Human-Robot Collaboration in the Workplace on Employees. Foreign Economics and Management, 2022, 44(9): 17. (in Chinese).

Ajoudani A, Zanchettin A M, Ivaldi S, et al. Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration[J]. Autonomous Robots, 2018, 42(5): 957-975.

Beasley C R, Jason L A, Miller S A. The General Environment Fit Scale: A Factor Analysis and Test of Convergent Construct Validity[J]. Am J Community Psychol, 2012, 50(12):64-76.

Cable D M, Derue D S. The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(5):875-884.

Charalambous G, Fletcher S, Webb P. Identifying the key organizational human factors for introducing human-robot collaboration in industry: an exploratory study[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 81: 2143-2155.

Deng H, Wu C H, Leung K, et al. Depletion from self‐regulation: A resource‐based account of the effect of value incongruence[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2016, 69(2): 431-465.

Dragan A D, Bauman S, Forlizzi J, et al. Effects of robot motion on human-robot collaboration[C]//2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 2015: 51-58.

Edwards J R, Caplan R D, Van Harrison R. Person-environment fit theory[J]. Theories of organizational stress, 1998, 28(1): 67-94.

French J R P, Caplan R D, Van Harrison R. The mechanisms of job stress and strain[M]. New York: Wiley, 1982.

Ho V T, Kong D T, Lee C H, et al. Promoting harmonious work passion among unmotivated employees: A two-nation investigation of the compensatory function of cooperative psychological climate[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2018, 106: 112-125.

Ho V T, Pollack J M. Passion isn't always a good thing: Examining entrepreneurs' network centrality and financial performance with a dualistic model of passion[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2014, 51(3): 433-459.

Hoffman G. Evaluating fluency in human–robot collaboration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Human-Robot Systems, 2019, 49(3): 209-218.

[15] Howard M C, Rose J C. Refining and extending task–technology fit theory: Creation of two task–technology fit scales and empirical clarification of the construct[J]. Information & Management, 2019, 56(6): 103134.

Hult C. Organizational commitment and person-environment fit in six western countries[J]. Organization Studies, 2005, 26(2): 249-270.

Jansen K J, Kristof-Brown A. Toward a multidimensional theory of Person -Environment Fit[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2006, Journal of Managerial Issues,2006,18(2):93-212.

Jin M H, McDonald B, Park J. Does public service motivation matter in public higher education? Testing the theories of person–organization fit and organizational commitment through a serial multiple mediation model[J]. The American Review of Public Administration, 2018, 48(1): 82-97.

Ket Kaew C, Manglakakeeree O, Naruetharadhol P. The interrelationships of work-related factors, person-environment fit, and employee turnover intention[J]. Cogent Business & Management, 2020, 7(1): 1823580.

Kopp T, Baumgartner M, Kinkel S. Success factors for introducing industrial human-robot interaction in practice: an empirically driven framework[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 112(3): 685-704.

Kristof‐Brown A L. Person-Organization Fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications[J]. Personnel Psychology,1996,49(1):1-49.

Lauver K J, Kristof-Brown A. Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit[J]. Journal of vocational behavior, 2001, 59(3): 454-470.

Lewin K. Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers (Edited by Dorwin Cartwright.) [J]. 1951.

Lu L, Zhang P, Zhang T C. Leveraging “human-likeness” of robotic service at restaurants[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2021, 94: 102823.

Oh I S, Guay R P, Kim K, et al. Fit happens globally: A meta‐analytic comparison of the relationships of person–environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2014, 67(1): 99-152.

Paliga M, Pollak A. Development and validation of the fluency in human-robot interaction scale. A two-wave study on three perspectives of fluency[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2021, 155: 102698.

Park J, Lee S, Brotherton K, et al. Identification of speech characteristics to distinguish human personality of introversive and extroversive male groups[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(6): 2125.

Pee L G, Min J. Employees ‘online knowledge sharing: the effects of person -environment fit[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2017, 21(2):432-453.

Psarakis L, Nathanael D, Marmaras N. Fostering short-term human anticipatory behavior in human-robot collaboration[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2022, 87: 103241.

Schein V E, Diamante T. Organizational attraction and the person-environment fit[J]. Psychological reports, 1988, 62(1): 167-173.

Schneider B. The people make the place[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1987, 40(3):437-453.

Schneider S, Kummert F. Comparing robot and human guided personalization: adaptive exercise robots are perceived as more competent and trustworthy[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2021, 13(2): 169-185.

Shen X L, Li Y J, Sun Y, et al. Person-environment fit, commitment, and customer contribution in online brand community: A nonlinear model[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 85: 117-126.

Van Vianen A E M. Person–environment fit: A review of its basic tenets[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, 5: 75-101.

Zhang M, Xu R, Wu H, et al. Human–robot collaboration for on-site construction[J]. Automation in Construction, 2023, 150: 104812.

Downloads

Published

25-04-2024

Issue

Section

Arcicles

How to Cite

Zhu, Q. (2024). The fluency of human-robot collaboration based on human-robot fit. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 2(3), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.62051/IJGEM.v2n3.39