Research on the Transformation Efficiency of Scientific and Technological Achievements of Minis-try-affiliated Universities Based on Network DEA

Xunliang Jia; Chuchu Wang

doi:10.62051/ijgem.v2n2.06

Authors

Xunliang Jia
Chuchu Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v2n2.06

Keywords:

Network DEA; ministry-affiliated universities; transformation of scientific and technological achievements; efficiency

Abstract

Previous studies on the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in universities were based on the black box model, and the results obtained were not comprehensive enough. This paper divides the transformation of scientific and technological achievements of universities into the knowledge research and development stage and the value transformation stage. The two-stage network DEA model is used to study the transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements of 55 subordinate universities based on the data from 2009 to 2017.The research in this paper finds that the overall efficiency of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in Chinese universities is relatively stable, and the efficiency of the knowledge research and development stage is relatively high, but the efficiency of the value realization stage is seriously low, resulting in a low level of overall efficiency."985" engineering colleges and "double first-class" colleges have higher input and output efficiency, and cluster analysis is used to classify and summarize the technological transformation of each college. Finally, corresponding development suggestions are put forward.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

F. T. Aleskerov and V. Yu. Belousova and V. V. Petrushchenko. Models of data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis in the efficiency assessment of universities[J]. Automation and Remote Control, 2017, 78(5) : 902-923.

Brzezicki Łukasz and Prędki Artur. Efficiency measurement of public higher education institutions using DEA, SFA and StoNED methods[J]. Wiadomości Statystyczne. The Polish Statistician, 2018, 63(5) : 5-24.

Xue Wuzhao et al. Assessing the Static and Dynamic Efficiency of Scientific Research of HEIs China: Three Stage DEA–Malmquist Index Approach[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(15) : 8207-8207.

Zhang Chonghui et al. Spreading knowledge and technology: Research efficiency at universities based on the three-stage MCDM-NRSDEA method with bootstrapping[J]. Technology in Society, 2022, 68.

Aleksandra Parteka and Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz. Dynamics of productivity in higher education: cross-european evidence based on bootstrapped Malmquist indices[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2013, 40(1) : 67-82.

Brendan Cantwell and Barrett J. Taylor. Global Status, Intra-Institutional Stratification and Organizational Segmentation: A Time-Dynamic Tobit Analysis of ARWU Position Among U.S. Universities[J]. Minerva, 2013, 51(2) : 195-223.

Marcella Bernardo et al. University library performance management: Applying zero-sum gains DEA models to resource allocation[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2020,: 100808-100808.

Mehdi Soltanifar and Marzieh Rahimian. An application of DEA based Malmquist productivity index in university performance analysis[J]. Management Science Letters, 2013, 3(1) : 337-344.

Nazarko J, Šaparauskas J. Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions[J]. Technological and Economic development of Economy, 2014, 20(1): 25-44.

Sagarra M, Mar-Molinero C, Agasisti T. Exploring the efficiency of Mexican universities: Integrating data envelopment analysis and multidimensional scaling[J]. Omega, 2017, 67: 123-133.

Shamohammadi M, Oh D. Measuring the efficiency changes of private universities of Korea: A two-stage network data envelopment analysis[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 148: 119730.

Du, Yamin, Seo,Wonchul. A Comparative Study on the Efficiency of R&D Activities of Universities in China by Region Using DEA–Malmquist. Sustainability 2022, 14,(2):11-25.

Delimiro Visbal-Cadavid and Mónica Martínez-Gómez and Francisco Guijarro. Assessing the Efficiency of Public Universities through DEA. A Case Study[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(8): 1416-1416.

Zhao Huan huan et al. Chinese Provincial Difference in the Efficiency of Universities’ Scientific and Technological Activities Based on DEA with Shared Input[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 2022.

Yang G, Fukuyama H, Song Y. Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(1): 10-30.

Yang W, Shao Y, Qiao H, et al. An empirical analysis on regional technical efficiency of Chinese steel sector based on network DEA method[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 31: 615-624.

Pan Wen Tsao et al. Comparison and Suggestions of Logistics Performance Index of Main Countries of Belt and Road Strategy Based on Bootstrap DEA Model[J]. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 2022: 2159578-2159578.

Mallikarjun S, Lewis H F, Sexton T R. Operational performance of US public rail transit and implications for public policy[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2014, 48(1): 74-88.

Bang Sungsig. Performance Evaluation of Energy Research Projects Using DEA Super-Efficiency[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(20) : 5318-5318.

Gabriela Vica Olariu and Stelian Brad. Efficiency Assessment of Universities with DEA Method Based on Public Data[J]. Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, 2017, 3(1) : 106-114.

Maritza Torres-Samuel et al. Performance of Education and Research in Latin American Countries through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2020, 170(C) : 1023-1028.

Wang Lifeng and Wang Tan. Research on the Scientific Research Efficiency of Provincial Universities Based on the DEA Model[J]. MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021.

Carolyn Dung Thi Thanh Tran and Renato A. Villano. Environmentally-adjusted efficiencies of Vietnamese higher education institutions: a multi-stage bootstrap DEA method[J]. International Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 36(3).

Golany B, Hackman S T, Passy U. An efficiency measurement framework for multi-stage production systems[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2006, 145(1): 51-68.