Land Dispute and Traditional Customs in the New Territories: Analysis of Tang Kwong Yu Tong Case

Han Shen

doi:10.62051/r7zg8z83

Authors

Han Shen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/r7zg8z83

Keywords:

Land Law; Legal History; Chinese Clan; Legislation; Custom; HKSAR.

Abstract

In this paper, one of the most important methodologies is the literature analysis, that is, the use of legal provisions and the original text of the judgment as the basis for the interpretation of the Tang Kwong Yu Tong case. Since the second half of the last century, a large number of scholars have been critical of the present-day land administration and traditions in Hong Kong, which have been regarded as a travesty of the law. However, an inquiry into the reasons for the existence of this custom in judicial practices requires not only legal analysis, but also consideration of the historical background. As a legal history paper, this paper will investigate the causes of land custom and the reasons for its continuation to the present day by combining case studies with historical knowledge. Despite the irrationalities and anachronisms of traditional land practices, these customs are bound to exist for a long period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tang Che Tai and Others v. Tang on Kwai and Others. HCA331/2002, Date of Judgment: 13rd April 2007, p42. https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=56677&QS=%24%28TANG%2CCHE%2CTAI%29&TP=JU.

Berman, Harold J. (Harold Joseph). The Interaction of Law and Religion[M]. London: SCM Press, 1974.

Chapter 452, New Territories Land (Exemption) Ordinance[Z]. 1994, https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap452.

Tao Zixiang. On Family Succession: and on the Regional Types of Rural Families in China[M]. Beijing: China Social Science Press, 2015.

Chapter 10 of the Probate and Administration Ordinance[Z]. 2020, https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap10.

Toru Inoue. The Ritual of Chinese Clans and States: An Analysis from the Perspective of Sovereign Legalism[M]. Tokyo: Kenbun Shuppan, 2000.

Nissim, Roger. Land Administration and Practice in Hong Kong. Fifth edition[M]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2021.

See the interpretation about Tso and Tong in Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region - Tso and Tong in the New Territories (legco.gov.hk)[Z]. https://www.legco.gov.hk/research-publications/ english/ essentials-2022ise08-tso-and-tong-in-the-new-territories.htm.

Subject to subsection (2), in any proceedings in the Court of First Instance or the District Court in relation to land in the New Territories, the court shall have power to recognize and enforce any Chinese custom or customary right affecting such land[Z]. 2019, https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap97!en-sc.

The Rules of the High Court, (Cap.2, Section 85), [1 May 1988] “An action may be brought for the determination of any question or for any relief which could be determined or granted, as the case may be, in an administration action and a claim need not be made in the action for the administration or execution under the direction of the Court of the estate or trust in connection with which the question arises or the relief is sought.” [Z]. https:// www. elegislation. gov.hk/hk/cap4A.

Tang Che Tai and Others v. Tang on Kwai and Others. HCA331/2002, Date of Judgment: 13rd April 2007, p32. https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=56677&QS=%24%28TANG%2CCHE%2CTAI%29&TP=JU.

Tang Che Tai and Others v. Tang on Kwai and Others. HCA331/2002, Date of Judgment: 13rd April 2007, p35. https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=56677&QS=%24%28TANG%2CCHE%2CTAI%29&TP=JU.

Chan, Selina Ching. Colonial policy in a borrowed place and time: Invented tradition in the new territories of Hong Kong[J]. European Planning Studies 7 (1999): 231-242.

Shuzo Shiga. The Laws and Tribunals of China (Qing Dynasty) [M]. Tokyo: Sobunsha, 1984. Pp 12-19.

Tang Che Tai and Others v. Tang on Kwai and Others. HCA331/2002, Date of Judgment: 13rd April 2007, p37. https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=56677&QS=%24%28TANG%2CCHE%2CTAI%29&TP=JU.

KUO Wei. The Complete Book of Chancery Court Judgments (Full). 1st ed. Taipei: Shih Hsien Press Co. 1972.

Katsumi Otsuka. Chinese Family Law Theory: History and Present Situation[M]. Tokyo: Ochanomizu Shobo, 1985. Pp181-182.

Tang Che Tai and Others v. Tang on Kwai and Others. HCA331/2002, Date of Judgment: 13rd April 2007, p38-39. https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=56677&QS=%24%28TANG%2CCHE%2CTAI%29&TP=JU.

See Kan Fat & Kan Yin-tat, [1987] HKLR 516. [Z]. https://legalref.judiciary. hk/lrs/common/ search/ search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=31778&QS=%24%28Kan%2CTat%2C%7BAnd%7D%2CKan%2CYin%5C- % 5Ctat%29%7C%28Kan%2CTat%2C%7BAnd%7D%2CKan%2CYin-tat%29&TP=JU.

Fei Xiaotong, The Fertility System in Native China[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1998.

Toru Inoue, The Ritual of Chinese Clans and States: An Analysis from the Perspective of Sovereign Legalism[M]. Tokyo: Kenbun Shuppan, 2000.

Kentaro Matsubara. "Traditional Chinese Society on 'Clan' and 'Ancestral Property' Structural Analysis based on the Cases of Hong Kong Area[J]. Journal of the Jurisprudence Association 116.7 (1999): 1098-1121.

Kentaro Matsubara. "Traditional Chinese Society on 'Clan' and 'Ancestral Property' (2) Structural Analysis based on the Cases of Hong Kong Area[J]. Journal of the Jurisprudence Association 117.7 (2000): 978-1042.

Morimitsu Kitamizu. A Study of the Ancestral Property System in China[M]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1949.

Tang Che Tai and Others v. Tang on Kwai and Others. HCA331/2002, Date of Judgment: 13rd April 2007, p79. https:// legalref. judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ search/search_ result_detail_ frame.jsp? DIS= 56677 &QS = % 24% 28 TANG %2CCHE%2CTAI%29&TP=JU.

Kentaro Matsubara. Whether a Trust or a Legal Person: The Governance of Clan Property in China[J]. Journal of Historical Anthropology, 2009,7(2) :74.

Frey, Alexander Hamilton. “Legal Analysis and the "De Facto" Doctrine[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 100 (1952): 1153.

CHEUNG Chi-fai, “Agreement to sale of Tso/Tong land” Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region - Tso and Tong in the New Territories (legco.gov.hk), issued by Legislative Council Secretariat, 24 March 2022.https://www.legco.gov.hk/research-publications/english/essentials-2022ise08-tso-and-tong-in-the-new-territories.htm.

Zhao Bing-zhi, ed., The Legal System of Hong Kong[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of the People's Public Security University of China. 1997.

Wang, L. M. An Exploration of the Reasons for China's Becoming a Civil Law Country in Modern Times and Related Issues [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 49.4 (2017): 102.

Merry, Malcolm. The unruly new territories: Small houses, ancestral estates, illegal structures, and other customary land practices of rural Hong Kong[M]. Hong Kong University Press, 2019.

Tang Kai-chung And Another v Tang Chik-shang And Others[Z]. HCA2071/1966, Date of Judgment: 18th April 1970. https://vlex.hk/vid/tang-kai-chung-and-862813116.

Chu Tak-hing v Chu Chan Cheung-kiu [Z], HCA162/1963, Date of Judgement: 25th May 1968. https:// vlex. hk/ vid/chu-tak-hing-v-862488614.

Dicks, Anthony. Treaty, grant, usage or sufferance? Some legal aspects of the status of Hong Kong[J]. The China Quarterly 95 (1983): 427-455.

Evans, D. M. "Common Law in a Chinese Setting-The Kernel or the Nut." Hong Kong LJ 1 (1971): 9. https:// web. law. hku.hk/hklj/house-style.php.

See Lau Yue Kui (administrator of estate of Lau Wai Chau, deceased) and Estate of Lau Leung Chau, deceased & Others LAU YUE KUI v. LAU YU HI AND OTHERS [1998] HKCFI 1006; [1998] 1 HKLRD 579; [1998] 3 HKC 562; HCMP 3209/1996 (7 January 1998) (hklii.hk). https://www.hklii.hk/eng/.

The Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, (Cap 2, Section 6) (section 7&8), [1 November 1984] [Z]. https:// www. elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap219.

About the original text, see Article 40, Chapter 3[Z]. https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclaw/chapter3.html.