Artificial Intelligence in Democracy: Unraveling the Influence of Social Bots in Brexit through Cybernetics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/kvkf1r94Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence; Cybernetics; Democratic Process; Social Bots; Information Manipulation; Brexit Referendum.Abstract
This paper delves into the implications of AI on the democratic process, particularly concerning the manipulation of information flows via cybernetic mechanisms. Through the lens of cybernetics, AI orchestrates information dissemination on web platforms, notably through Social Bots, autonomous programs simulating human behavior to sway public discourse. This study examines how AI's manipulation of information, exemplified by the case of Social Bots in the 2016 UK Brexit referendum, influences democratic participation and election outcomes. Amidst a regulatory landscape characterized by lax oversight, understanding the intricate interplay between AI, cybernetics, and democratic processes is imperative for addressing ethical concerns and safeguarding democratic integrity. This paper underscores the urgency of establishing industry benchmarks to regulate AI's role in shaping public discourse and its consequential impact on democratic decision-making.
Downloads
References
Bruno, M., Lambiotte, R., & Saracco, F. (2022). Brexit and bots: characterizing the behaviour of automated accounts on Twitter during the UK election. EPJ Data Science, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00330-0.
Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., & Woodside, T. (2023). An overview of catastrophic AI risks. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.12001.
Hajli, N., Saeed, U., Tajvidi, M., & Shirazi, F. (2021). Social bots and the spread of disinformation in social media: The Challenges of Artificial intelligence. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1238–1253. https://doi. org/ 10.1111/1467-8551.12554.
Howard, P. N., & Kollányi, B. (2016). Bots, #Strongerin, and #Brexit: Computational propaganda during the UK-EU referendum. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2798311.
Kane, T. B. (2019). Artificial intelligence in Politics: Establishing ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 38(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2019.2894474.
Mira, J., & Ana, E. D. (2006). A CYBERNETIC VIEW OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae, 64(2), 331–349. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10020292782.
Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114.
Matook, S., Brown, S. A., & Rolf, J. (2015). Forming an intention to act on recommendations given via online social networks. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.28.
Ross, B., Pilz, L., Cabrera, B., Brachten, F., Neubaum, G., & Stieglitz, S. (2019). Are social bots a real threat? An agent-based model of the spiral of silence to analyse the impact of manipulative actors in social networks. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(4), 394–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2018.1560920.
Wiener, N. (2019). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. In The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11810.001.0001.
Wogu, I. a. P., Misra, S., Udoh, O. D., Agoha, B. E., Sholarin, M. A., & Ahuja, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence politicking and human rights violations in UK’s democracy: A critical appraisal of the Brexit referendum. In Springer eBooks (pp. 615–626). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8297-4_49.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








