Making Digital Technology Return to The Essence of Government Affairs: Generative Logic and Resolution Strategy of Digital Administrative Burden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/848k0435Keywords:
Digital Government; Administrative Burden; Digital Administrative Burden.Abstract
Along with the continuous advancement of the digital government construction in our country, in order to effectively build a service-oriented government that the people are truly satisfied with, this article discusses the administrative burden that the digital government brings to the citizens in the implementation process, analyzes the reasons and proposes the solution path, and provides the reference for future research.Based on the interview method, the experience and feelings of different groups in the process of interacting with the digital government are intuitively obtained. The research finds that the learning cost, obedience cost and psychological cost borne by different groups are slightly different, which is related to the service attitude of government staff and the friendliness of product development and design. Relevant departments should improve the working system to improve the quality of the team. Improve the response mechanism and the product temperature; Strengthen digital empowerment, optimize government services and other measures to reduce the administrative burden of citizens in the implementation of digital government.
Downloads
References
BURDEN B C, CANON D T, MAYER K R, et al. The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: evidence from election administration[J]. Public Administration Review,2012,72(5):74-75.
Zhu Chunkui, Tong Peishan. Research Progress and Prospect of administrative burden in the field of Public Administration [J]. Review of Public Administration, 2019,16(05):158-176+199-200.
Herd P, Moynihan DP. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2018, pp.1-2.
Ma Liang. How can digital government reduce administrative burden? [J].Administrative Reform, 2022, (09): 4-12.
PEETERS R. Digital Administrative Burdens: An Agenda for Analyzing the Citizen Experience of Digital Bu-reaucratic Encounters [J]. Perspectives on Public Manage-ment and Governance, 2019,6(1):7-13.
MOYNIHAN D, HERD P, HARVEY H. Adminis-trative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-state Interactions[J]. Journal of Public Ad-ministration Research and Theory,2015,25(1):43-69.
MADSEN C 0, LINDGREN I, MEL IN U. The Accidental Caseworker-How Digital Self-Service Influences Citizens' Administrative Burden[J/OL]. Govemment Infor-mation Quarterly, 2022, 39(1).
Ma Liang. Administrative Burden: Research Review and Theoretical Prospect [J]. Journal of Gansu Administration University, 2022, (01):4-14+124.
Ma Liang. How can the digital government reduce the administrative burden? [J].Administrative Reform, 2022, (09):4-12.
Cao Haijun, Ma Haojie. Digital Government and Administrative Burden: A Systematic literature Review [J]. Application of Information Technology and Management,2023,2(04):129-142.
Guo Siyu. Research on current situation and Countermeasures of digital government construction in China [D]. Liaoning University,2023.
Ma Liang. Administrative Burden: Research Review and Theoretical Prospect [J]. Journal of Gansu Administration University, 2022, (01):4-14+124.
MADSEN J K. Mitigating psycho-logical costs-the role of citizens' administrative literacy and social capital [J]. Public Administration Review, 2022.
LAN Shuai. Existing problems and countermeasures of digital government construction in Jiahe City [D]. Heilongjiang University, 2023.
Xu Shunfeng. Research on Civil servants' counter-productive behavior under pressure system [D]. Northwestern University, 2016.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
