How Homosexuals Were Barred from Federal Employment by the Eisenhower Government in the 1950s
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/6d4crx49Keywords:
Lavender Scare; Homophobia; Cold War; Executive Order 10450; National Security Rhetoric.Abstract
Amid the Cold War hysteria of the 1950s, the U.S. government also pursued a separate purge known as the “Lavender Scare,” which ousted lesbians and gay men from federal employment. The official justification was national security and the fears of potential blackmail, but the real reason, as this article suggests, lay deeper: legacy homophobia thrived on a postwar era of heightened prudery. By way of a rhetorical analysis of documents' figurative language, this article first unpacks the euphemizing code of a 1951 Congressional Report to reveal, via a preexisting medicalization of homosexuality and codification of bias to bureaucratic rule, a narrative of homosexuals as inherently unstable "sexual perverts". The paper then deconstructs the gut-level rhetoric of politicians like Senator Miller, revealing his reliance on particular types of McCarthyism as a strategy to weaponize moral panic and to conflate the homosexual threat with the communist threat. The paper argues that the logic of the Lavender Scare was circular, with state-sponsored homophobia producing the very conditions of vulnerability it purported to defend against. Ultimately, the study exposes the harm evoked by these sensations, which not only ruined innumerous lives, but paradoxically served to incite the formation of some of the first homophile rights organizations, demonstrating the staggering ease with which bigotry may be legalized under the rhetoric of national security.
Downloads
References
[1] D.K. Johnson, The lavender scare: The Cold War persecution of gays and lesbians in the federal government, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2023.
[2] N. Shibusawa, The lavender scare and empire: Rethinking Cold War antigay politics, Diplomatic History 36 (2012) 723-752.
[3] D.F. Janssen, Egalitarian: From Homophile to Helicophile in Post–World War II America, Journal of Homosexuality 65 (2018) 1656-1682.
[4] D.W. Cory, The homosexual in America: a subjective approach, Arno Press, New York, 1975.
[5] U.S. Congressional Record, Congressman Arthur L. Miller gives “the Putrid Facts” about Homosexuality, Information on: https://www.congress.gov/crecb/1950/GPO-CRECB-1950-pt20-Pages394-397.pdf.
[6] R.C. Friedman, Homosexuality, psychopathology, and suicidality, Archives of general psychiatry 56 (1999) 887-888.
[7] PBS Frontline, Assault on Gays: Employment, Information on: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ assault/context/employment.html.
[8] Wikipedia, Executive Order 10450, Information on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_10450.
[9] The American Yawp Reader, Congressman Arthur L. Miller gives “the Putrid Facts” about Homosexuality (1950), Information on: https://www.americanyawp.com/reader/26-the-affluent-society/congressman-arthur-l-miller-gives-the-putrid-facts-about-homosexuality-1950/.
[10] M.A. George, Bureaucratic Agency: Administering the Transformation of LGBT Rights, Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 36 (2017) 83-133.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








