The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the Protection of Data Legal Interests in Criminal Law: A Case Study of ChatGPT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/b6gyfb19Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence; Data Legal Interests in Criminal Law; Lag of Criminal Law; Responsible Entities; Sentencing Models.Abstract
The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) poses significant challenges to the current framework of data legal interest protection under Chinese criminal law. Represented by models such as ChatGPT, GAI systems possess powerful capabilities in data extraction, analysis, and generation. Even when data is obtained legally, the use of deep mining, correlation analysis, and multimodal outputs may give rise to new forms of data-related criminal risks. However, China’s current criminal law framework, which centers on “data control” and emphasizes the protection of data at the source, lacks adequate regulation over behaviors characterized by “lawful acquisition + unlawful analysis.” In addition, existing issues such as the outdated classification of criminal offenses, ambiguity in identifying responsible actors, and disproportionately lenient sentencing standards have further endangered the effective protection of data-related legal interests. To address these emerging challenges, criminal law should evolve by expanding the scope of liability, improving legislative frameworks, enhancing regulatory coordination, and restructuring penal models. These efforts would facilitate a paradigm shift in governance from "data control" to "data utilization", aiming to reconcile the tension between technological innovation and the protection of legal interests.
Downloads
References
[1] Liao, Lingmei, Liu, Zhou, Luo, Shu, et al. (2025). A Study on the Path of Empowering Basic Theories of Traditional Chinese Medicine with AI Technology. Journal of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Social Science Edition), 26 (02), 138 – 142.
[2] Fang, Huiying. (2023). A Systematic Assessment and Multi-Dimensional Construction of the Criminal Law Regulation Model for Data Crimes. Theory and Reform, (6), 78 – 79.
[3] Liu, Xianquan. (2024). New Approaches to Criminal Law Regulation of Data Crimes Involving Generative Artificial Intelligence. Contemporary Law, 38 (06), 3 – 15.
[4] Meng, Tianguang. (2023). Intelligent Governance: Governance Propositions in the Era of Artificial General Intelligence. Xuehai, (2), 42.
[5] Jin, Zixin. (2024). Operating Mechanism, Potential Risks, and Legal Responses of Generative Artificial Intelligence from a Data Perspective. Journal of Chengdu Administrative College, (06), 59 – 70+119.
[6] Yang, Jianwu, Luo, Feiyan. (2024). Operating Mechanism, Legal Risks, and Regulatory Paths of ChatGPT-like Generative AI. Administration and Law, (04), 101 – 115.
[7] The Paper. (n.d.). Disaster from GPT-2's Mouth: Chatting with AI and Extracting Others' Privacy. Retrieved from https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_10468395.
[8] Fan, Xuehan, Lü, Qian. (2023, April 7). Italy's Ban Sparks Waves: ChatGPT Faces Data Security Challenges. China Business News, A01.
[9] Information retrieved from: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1827015640159974536&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[10] Liu, Xianquan. (2023). The Impact of Generative AI on the Criminal Law Protection System for Data Interests. Journal of Chinese Criminal Law, (04), 20 – 34.
[11] Liu, Xianquan, Yu, Yueyang. (2024). Criminal Law Improvement for Securities and Futures Crimes Involving Generative AI. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University, (03), 47 – 57.
[12] Yu, Gaizhi. (2022). From Control to Utilization: A Paradigm Shift in Criminal Law Data Governance. Social Sciences in China, (07), 56 – 74+205.
[13] Liu, Xianquan. (2024). New Approaches to Criminal Law Regulation of Data Crimes Involving Generative Artificial Intelligence. Contemporary Law, 38 (06), 3 – 15.
[14] Sheng, Hao. (2023). Criminal Risks of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Legal Regulation. Journal of Southwest University of Political Science & Law, 25 (04), 122 – 136.
[15] Li, Zhenlin, Pan, Xinyuan. (2023). Dilemmas and Responses in Criminal Law Protection of Data Security under Generative AI: A Perspective Based on ChatGPT. Criminal Research, (02), 25 – 33.
[16] Information retrieved from: http://www.gdcourts.gov.cn/xwzx/fayuanxinmeiti/content/mpost_1733943.html
[17] Liu, Xianquan. (2023). The Impact of Generative AI on the Criminal Law Protection System for Data Interests. Journal of Chinese Criminal Law, (04), 20 – 34.
[18] Zhang, Xiaoyan. (2021). On the Criminal Subject Status of Strong Artificial Intelligence (Master’s thesis). Qingdao University.
[19] Chen, Wei, Xiang, Minxi. (2024). Rethinking the Criminal Subject Qualification of Generative AI such as ChatGPT from the Perspective of “Cultivation Theory”. Journal of Anhui Normal University (Social Science Edition), 52 (05), 96 – 106.
[20] Yuan, Zeng. (2023). A Study on the Responsibility Capacity of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Oriental Law, (03), 18 – 33.
[21] Xi Jinping. (2023). Selected Readings from Xi Jinping’s Works, Vol. 1. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, pp. 27 – 28.
[22] Zhang, Xiaoyan. (2021). On the Criminal Subject Status of Strong Artificial Intelligence (Master’s thesis). Qingdao University, p. 31.
[23] Liu, Xianquan. (2022). A Study on the Improvement of Criminal Law Regulation of Data Crimes. Journal of Chinese Criminal Law, (05), 20 – 35.
[24] Zhang, Jianjun. (2005). Challenges and Development of the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law. Gansu Agriculture, (10), 146 – 147.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
