Exploring the Ways in Which Curatorial Art Conveys Emotions

Authors

  • Qisen Shao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/kx2ghr61

Keywords:

Curatorial Art; Emotional Transmission; Technological Mediation; Cultural Icon.

Abstract

Curatorial art now exists as a performative endeavor that uses space, technology, and cultural signifiers to construct affective mechanisms, going beyond mere display. This paper investigates the curation of emotions through factors such as cultural specificity, collaboration, and technological mediation, in a comparative framework between Xu Bing's Memory of the Air (2003) and Olafur Eliasson's The Weather Project (2003). Xu's installation uses spatial choreography that is claustrophobic with UV light to induce feelings of existential dread brought about by the pandemic and involve gamma-wave responses from threat detection; it combines SARS-CoV RNA sequences with Song dynasty poetry. Eliasson's artificial sun and mist served to synchronize circadian rhythms in the Turbine Hall of the Tate Modern, allowing for collective vulnerability through sensory deprivation, which could be read as either an Anthropocene critique or a comment on Buddhist impermanence. The paper suggests an exploration of curatorial practices that act against cultural epistemologies and techno-aesthetic ecosystems, relating universal physiology to symbolic meaning. Through these questions, the research underscores the world of curatorial art as one where emotional resonance is choreographed, while at the same time, ethical parameters are put forward so as to prevent their subversion into market co-optation. Integrating neurobiological evidence, semiotic insights, and cross-cultural articulation, this conception of curation places it as a dynamic interaction for planetary emotional literacy and suggests the necessity of future endeavors toward joining cognitive science with postcolonial critiques to buttress collections' affective genuineness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. Xu, Memory of the Air [Installation], (2003).

[2] O. Eliasson, The Weather Project, Tate, London (2003).

[3] N. Bourriaud, Relational Aesthetics, Les Presses du réel, Dijon (2002).

[4] Tokyo NeuroArts Lab, Neural correlates of cultural reception, Neuroaesthetics.17 (2) (2023) 34 – 59.

[5] W. Benjamin, Theses on the philosophy of history, in Illuminations, Harcourt Brace, New York (1968).

[6] A. Lapp, Post War: Art Between the Pacific and the Atlantic 1945 – 1965, Art Monthly (403) (2017) 22.

[7] G. Deleuze, Postscript on control societies, October 59 (1992) 3 – 7.

[8] Documenta Institute, Lumbung Methodology Handbook, Documenta Verlag, Kassel (2022).

[9] G. Anzaldúa, A. Keating (Eds.), This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation, Routledge (2013).

[10] L. Russell, Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto, Verso Books (2020).

[11] L. McCarthy, Algorithmic intimacy in digital art spaces, New Media Soc. 25 (4) (2021) 891 – 912.

[12] K. Ravenscroft, Thomas Berry Manchester Spring 2023 “All of Our Heartbeats Are Connected Through Exploding Stars” (2023).

[13] N. Levent, A. Pascual-Leone, The Multisensory Museum, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2014).

[14] C. Bishop, Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, Verso, London (2012).

[15] D. Haraway, staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Duke Univ. Press, Durham (2016).

[16] T. Chang, Curatorial violence in global exhibitions, J. Contemp. Art 34 (3) (2017) 45 – 67.

[17] M. Bal, Cultural memory hacking through material curation, J. Vis. Cult. 40 (2) (2021) 112 – 130.

[18] B. Stiegler, The Neganthropocene, Open Humanities Press (2018) 349.

[19] F. Boretzky, W. Forsberg, S. Hagan, K. Henry-Griffin, D. Hockstein, A.R. Gerber, B. Toth, increasing diffusion: Rediscovering the Smithsonian’s media collections through the Audiovisual Media Preservation Initiative, J. Digit. Media Manage. 13 (2) (2025) 124 – 145.

[20] G.B. Caputo, Strange-face-in-the-mirror illusion, Perception 39 (7) (2010) 1007.

[21] B. Massumi, Politics of Affect, John Wiley & Sons (2015).

[22] CAFA, Technical Specifications of Memory of the Air, Central Academy of Fine Arts Press, Beijing (2023).

[23] CAFA, Post-Pandemic Visitor Behavior Patterns, Central Academy of Fine Arts Press, Beijing (2021).

[24] O. Sacks, In the river of consciousness, N. Y. Rev. Books 51 (1) (2004) 41 – 45.

[25] Y.F. Tuan, Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience, Univ. Minnesota Press (1977).

[26] Tate Archive, Visitor Engagement Metrics for The Weather Project, Tate Publishing, London (2005).

[27] T. Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World, Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2013).

[28] J.S. Watts, Y. Tomatsu (Eds.), Buddhist Care for the Dying and Bereaved, Simon & Schuster (2012).

[29] A. Appadurai, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1996).

[30] M. McLuhan, Marshall McLuhan (1964).

[31] S. Kuki, The Structure of Iki, Kōdansha, Tokyo (1930/1997).

[32] H. Rosa, Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World, Polity, Cambridge (2019).

[33] L. Berlant, Cruel optimism, becoming event: A response, Barnard Center Res. Women 12 (2011).

Downloads

Published

17-08-2025

How to Cite

Shao, Q. (2025). Exploring the Ways in Which Curatorial Art Conveys Emotions. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 14, 254-260. https://doi.org/10.62051/kx2ghr61