Criminalization standard of providing false information in network account transactions and retrieving accounts unilaterally

Authors

  • Wenhao Xia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/1apq7n46

Keywords:

Criminalization standard, online account, false information, retrieving accounts.

Abstract

In online account transactions, the seller providing false information and unilaterally retrieving the account are common actions that may lead to criminal prosecution. However, there is still controversy over the standards for convicting the two crimes in theory and practice. These two behaviours are both standard practices by sellers that harm the interests of buyers, and they may even co-occur in the same transaction. Moreover, under certain circumstances, these two behaviours may produce some ambiguity in definition or interrelatedness, thus making it valuable to study both simultaneously. Regarding providing false information, attention should be paid to its subjective intent and the standards of erroneous understanding. Regarding retrieving an account unilaterally, attention should be paid to its confidentiality requirements and the differences in civil and criminal boundaries and charges involved in the contract. In addition, for the behaviours of both parties, attention should be paid to the responsibilities of the operator platform and the transaction intermediary platform, as well as the establishment of accurate measurement standards for the market transaction value of accounts and the value of user investment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen, X. 2003. Normative Criminal Law. China University of Political Science and Law Press: 499.

[2] Li, H. 2016. Criminal Law Theory (2nd Ed.). Law Press China: p313.

[3] Li, J. 2017. The Criminal Law Protection of Virtual Property. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Social Sciences) 25 (04), 50-56.

[4] Liu, M. 2016. Qualitative Study on the Theft of Virtual Property in Cyberspace. Law science (01), 151-160.

[5] Tao, X & Liu Z. 2007. On the Legal Protection of Virtual Property in the Internet. Political Science and Law (04), 96-100.

[6] Wang, P & Zhan, J. 2023. Judicial Regulations of Property Infringement Acts Involving Online Game Account Transactions. Journal of Criminal Investigation Police University of China (06), 66-77.

[7] Xu, L. 2017. Dogmatic Analyze on the Crime against Virtual Property. The Jurist (04), 44-57+176.

[8] Zhang M. 2005. On the Property Disposition Behavior in Fraud Crimes. China Legal Science (5): 118.

[9] Zhang, M. 2006. The Difference between Theft and Plunder. The Jurist (2): 119-131.

[10] Zhang, M. 2015 the nature of the act of illegally obtaining virtual property. Supreme People's Procuratorate of People's Republic of China.

[11] Zhang, Y. 2006. Discussing the Determination of the Value of Virtual Property in Online Games. People's Judicature (11), 74-75.

Downloads

Published

17-08-2025

How to Cite

Xia, W. (2025). Criminalization standard of providing false information in network account transactions and retrieving accounts unilaterally. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 14, 125-131. https://doi.org/10.62051/1apq7n46