Legal Analysis, Prevention and Management of Academic Sexual Harassment in Chinese University: A Comparison between the Legislation of the United States and China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/87kf8176Keywords:
Sexual harassment; College and university; Students under authorities.Abstract
In the current legal landscape, the existing domestic laws in China fall short of providing adequate assistance to students who have suffered from academic sexual harassment. Moreover, these laws fail to make the obligations of the corresponding responsible parties clear, thus universities and colleges don’t play a effective role in the situation. Therefore, the current Chinese law of sexual harassment need explanations and a more effective structure for prevention. This study aims to explores the purpose and the context of legislation of sexual harassment prevention and relief in the United States, and compares domestic laws with the intention of better applying the law in China. This study provides detailed implementation to the law and more clarification obligatory of rights, and serves as a valuable reference for establishing supervisions in both universities and society as dedicated departments on campus and Women's Federation based on the existing legal documents and institutional settings.
Downloads
References
[1] Information on: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/kcQ4dhIoVqwv7_-Zf32PRQ.
[2] Chunling Liu, American System and Practice on Prevention and Treatment of Sexual Harassment in Universities: The Main Obligations of the Universities under Title IX, Journal of Chinese Women's Studies. 163(2018) 111-120.
[3] Nancy Chi Cantalupo, William C. Kidder, A Systematic Look at A Serial Problem: Sexual Harassment of Students by University Faculty, Utah Law Review. 671 (2018) 1-33.
[4] Dominic S. Angiollo, Risky Sexual Behavior--The “Broken Windows” Of Sexual Assault: A Proposal For universities To Incorporate Targeted Intervention To Bridge The Gap Between Sexual Assault Prevention And Response, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law. 26(2018) 881-945.
[5] Sandy Welsh, Gender and Sexual Harassment, Annual Review of Sociology. 25 (1999) 169-190.
[6] Jing Yang, Regulation of Sexual Harassment on College Campuses under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 of the United States, Journal of Human Rights Law. 1(2024) 138-172.
[7] Ann J. Cahill, MacKinnon, Title IX, and Sexual Harassment: An Intellectual History, Feminist Legal Studies. 32(2024) 285-307.
[8] Zhizhuang Duan, Is Power Structure a Necessary and Inadequate Condition for Sexual Harassment?, Xiamen University Law Review. 35(2022) 244-257.
[9] Ellen Frankel Paul, Sexual Harassment As Sex Discrimination: A Defective Paradigm, Yale Law and Policy Review. 8(1990) 333-357.
[10] Jon Gould, Title IX in the Classroom: Academic Freedom and the Power to Harass, Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy. 6 (2000) 61-88.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








