Research on the Application of Chaozhou Gold Lacquered Wood Carving 'Shrimp and Crab Basket' in Traditional Architectural Design

Authors

  • Jing Ye
  • Chen Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/xkj4s376

Keywords:

Chaozhou Gold Lacquered Wood Carving; Shrimp and Crab Basket; Traditional Architectural Design; Cultural Heritage; Modern Application.

Abstract

Chaozhou gold lacquered wood carving, as an outstanding representative of traditional Chinese crafts, holds a unique position in the field of traditional Chinese architectural art due to its exquisite craftsmanship and profound cultural heritage. This paper focuses on the 'Shrimp and Crab Basket' element, showcasing its significant achievements at both technical and cultural levels. Through in-depth literature research and investigation of lacquer craftsmanship, this study explores the historical background and craft characteristics of Chaozhou gold lacquered wood carving, with a particular emphasis on the importance of the 'Shrimp and Crab Basket' in this tradition. The paper also examines the unique features of Chaozhou traditional architectural decorative art, providing a rich context for understanding the application of the 'Shrimp and Crab Basket' in the field of architecture. It specifically analyzes examples of the 'Shrimp and Crab Basket' in various traditional Chaozhou buildings, revealing its functional and symbolic significance in architectural design and discussing how to innovate artistically while respecting tradition. Ultimately, the paper summarizes the important role of the 'Shrimp and Crab Basket' in traditional Chaozhou architectural design and looks forward to its potential applications in future architectural design. This research not only deepens the understanding of Chaozhou gold lacquered wood carving art but also offers a new perspective on the application of traditional crafts in modern architectural design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jin Zisong. Chaozhou Gold Lacquer Wood Carving Art and Its Application in Modern Home Design. Collection and Investment, 2023, 14(10): 147-149. DOI: 10.19897/j.cnki.scytz.2023.10.053

Jiang Lin. Tradition and Modernity: The Path to Developing Chaozhou Gold Lacquer Wood Carving Art Using ICT. Daguan (Forum), 2023, (05): 30-32.

Jiang Lin. A Comparison of Chaozhou Gold Lacquer Wood Carving and Chinese Painting Art. Daguan (Forum), 2023, (04): 15-17.

Shi Haobin. Large-Scale Gold Lacquer Wood Carving in Late Qing Dynasty Guangzhou - Panyu Shenlou. Cultural Relics and World, 2019, (12): 20-23.

Xue Yan. Exploring the Narrative Style of Craft Art History in University Art Museums: An Overview of the Research Exhibition "Qiankun Playfield - Research Exhibition of Ming and Qing Chaozhou Gold Lacquer Wood Carving Collection of Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts." Art Observation, 2018(06): 32-33.

Zhang Yujin, Zhou Yanling. Research on the Symbolic Symbols of Chaozhou Old Houses' Gold Lacquer Wood Carving Based on Ethical Views. Appraisal and Appreciation of Cultural Relics, 2018, (07): 78-79.

Xinshiqi. Gold Lacquer Wood Carving: Behind and in Front of the Millennium Inheritance. Cultural Monthly, 2016, (14): 29-36+28.

Liu Qiumei. Bibliometrics and Visualization Analysis of Chaozhou Wood Carving Research. Journal of Hanshan Normal University, 2021, 42(04): 69-75+101.

Wang Yue, Zheng Zhiqiang. Aesthetic Education Research on the Gold Lacquer Wood Carving Patterns of Chaozhou Ji Lue Huang Gong Temple. Art Literature, 2021, (02): 78-80. DOI: 10.16585/j.cnki.mswx.2021.02.037

Chen Wenyan. The Inheritance and Development of Chaozhou Wood Carving Lacquer Art. Collection, 2018, (08): 148-153.

Cheng Weixin. A Brief Discussion on the Inheritance and Development of Chaozhou Gold Lacquer Wood Carving. Tiangong (Heavenly Work), 2017, (04): 156.

Downloads

Published

12-03-2024

How to Cite

Ye, J., & Zhang, C. (2024). Research on the Application of Chaozhou Gold Lacquered Wood Carving ’Shrimp and Crab Basket’ in Traditional Architectural Design. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 4, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.62051/xkj4s376