Optimizing Resources to Address STEM Gender Disparities in Western China

Xiang (Oscar) Wan

doi:10.62051/96tez472

Authors

Xiang (Oscar) Wan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/96tez472

Keywords:

STEM Gender Disparities; Optimizing Resource Distribution; Closing the Gender Gap.

Abstract

This research elucidates gender inequality in STEM fields in western China, leveraging extensive data from the China Education Panel Survey (CEPS) encompassing 20,000 students from 112 schools. It explores disparities in educational outcomes and aspirations in STEM, framed by gender and economic backgrounds. The study employs a conceptual framework and optimization model to categorize schools by location and rank and propose an equitable resource allocation method to mitigate gender gaps. By focusing on optimizing resource distribution to address disparities, this study contributes to fostering a diverse and inclusive STEM environment, offering insights for policy improvements and interventions aimed at promoting gender and economic equity in education in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Liu, R. (2018). Gender-math stereotype, biased self-assessment, and aspiration in STEM careers: The gender gap among early adolescents in China. Comparative Education Review, 62(4), 522-541.

Golley, J., & Kong, S. T. (2018). Inequality of opportunity in China's educational outcomes. China Economic Review, 51, 116-128.

Podobnik, B., Crawford, G. C., Lichtenstein, B., Lipic, T., Wild, D., Zhang, X., & Stanley, H. E. (2020). The new wealth of nations: How STEM fields generate the prosperity and inequality of individuals, companies, and countries. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 141, 110323.

Li, J., Feldman, M. W., Li, S., & Daily, G. C. (2011). Rural household income and inequality under the Sloping Land Conversion Program in western China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(19), 7721-7726.

Li, X., Shenggen, F. A. N., Xiaopeng, L. U. O., & Zhang, X. (2009). Community poverty and inequality in western China: A tale of three villages in Guizhou Province. China Economic Review, 20(2), 338-349.

Blackburn, H. (2017). The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017. Science & Technology Libraries, 36(3), 235–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658.

Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631.

Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236.

García-Holgado, A., Verdugo-Castro, S., González, C., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). European Proposals to Work in the Gender Gap in STEM: A Systematic Analysis. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 15(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2020.3008138.

Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005.

Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2012). The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? Prior Achievement Fails to Explain Gender Inequality in Entry Into STEM College Majors Over Time. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1048–1073. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211435229.

White, B. A., Miles, J. R., & Frantell, K. A. (2021). Intergroup dialogue: A justice-centered pedagogy to address gender inequity in STEM. Science Education, 105(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21599.