The Evolving Role of the EU in the WTO Multilateral Trading System

Chenqing Zhang; Siqi Li; Junwei Chi

doi:10.62051/4fkq3s87

Authors

Chenqing Zhang
Siqi Li
Junwei Chi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/4fkq3s87

Keywords:

the evolving role; the EU; WTO multilateral trading system.

Abstract

The article discusses the European Union's commitment to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its trade policy. The EU has been a strong advocate for open markets and free trade, with the WTO at the core of its trade policy. However, the article highlights a growing gap between the EU's ideals and its actual practices, particularly during the Doha Round of WTO negotiations, where the EU's leadership was criticized for its stance on agricultural subsidies, services sector liberalization, and high-standard agenda, which contributed to the negotiation's stalemate.The article examines the EU's role in the Doha Round, its approach to Non-Agricultural Market Access (NAMA), services issues, and the Singapore Issues. It notes the EU's shift from a proactive reformer to a reactive defender, adopting a more pragmatic approach to negotiations. The EU has also been accused of "creeping protectionism," where it has incrementally adopted protectionist measures under the guise of trade defense.Furthermore, the article discusses the EU's motivation for WTO reforms, its efforts to coordinate positions among WTO members, and its attempts to lead WTO reform amid rising tensions between China and the USA. The EU has published a guiding document on WTO reform, outlining its concerns and priorities, such as dispute settlement, intellectual property protection, and subsidies. In summary, the article reflects on the EU's role in the WTO, its challenges in the Doha Round, the development of protectionist tendencies, and its active role in promoting WTO reforms. It concludes by emphasizing the EU's responsibility to embrace diversity and lead in transforming the global system for the advancement of humankind.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Alan Swinbank, ‘Developments in the Doha Round and WTO Dispute Settlement: Some Implications for EU Agricultural Policy’ (2005) 32 European Review of Agricultural Economics 551.

[2] Hubert Zimmermann, ‘How the EU Negotiates Trade and Democracy: The Cases of China’s Accession to the WTO and the Doha Round’ (2008) 13 European Foreign Affairs Review 255.

[3] Charnovitz, Steve, ‘An Analysis of Pascal Lamy’s Proposal on Collective Preferences’ [2004] SSNR.

[4] Jensen, Michael Friis, and Peter Gibbon. , ‘Africa and the WTO DOHA Round: An Overview." ’ [2007] Development Policy Review 5.

[5] Stephen W Hartman, ‘The WTO, the Doha Round Impasse, PTAs, and FTAs/RTAs’ (2013) 27 The International Trade Journal 411.

[6] Alan Swinbank, ‘Developments in the Doha Round and WTO Dispute Settlement: Some Implications for EU Agricultural Policy’ (2005) 32 European Review of Agricultural Economics 551.

[7] Peter Holmes, Jeremy Kempton and Francis McGowan, ‘International Competition Policy and Telecommunications. Lessons from the EU and Prospects for the WTO’ (1996) 20 Telecommunications Policy 755.

[8] ‘WTO-DDA: EU Ready to Go the Extra Mile in Three Key Areas of the Talks’ (www.mondialisations.org) <http://www.mondialisations.org/php/public/art.php?id=12478lan=ES&lan=EN> accessed 30 April 2024.

[9] HUBERT ZIMMERMANN, ‘Realist Power Europe? The EU in the Negotiations about China’s and Russia’s WTO Accession’ (2007) 45 JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 813.

[10] Henrik Horn, Petros C Mavroidis and André Sapir, ‘Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’ (2010) 33 The World Economy 1565.

[11] Mehdi Shafaeddin, ‘The Political Economy of WTO with Special Reference to NAMA Negotiations’ (2010) 22 The European Journal of Development Research 175.

[12] Sheila Page and Adrian Hewitt, ‘The New European Trade Preferences: Does “Everything but Arms” (EBA) Help the Poor?’ (2002) 20 Development Policy Review 91.

[13] Yan Luo, ‘Engaging the Private Sector: EU–China Trade Disputes under the Shadow of WTO Law?’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal 800.

[14] Ismail, Faizel. "An assessment of the WTO Doha round July–December 2008 collapse." World Trade Review 8.4 (2009): 579-605.

[15] Henrik Horn, Petros C Mavroidis and André Sapir, ‘Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’ (2010) 33 The World Economy 1565.

[16] Jeon Sohi, ‘The “Battle of Hong Kong” and Implications for Asian Social Movements’ (2006) 7 Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 353.

[17] Rorden Wilkinson, ‘The WTO in Hong Kong: What It Really Means for the Doha Development Agenda’ (2006) 11 New Political Economy 291.

[18] Cornelia Woll and Alvaro Artigas, ‘When Trade Liberalization Turns into Regulatory Reform: The Impact on Business?Government Relations in International Trade Politics’ (2007) 1 Regulation & Governance 121.

[19] Rahman, Mustafizur, and Wasel Bin Shadat. "NAMA negotiations in the WTO and preference erosion: concerns of Bangladesh and other regional LDCs." (2006).

[20] Shafaeddin, Mehdi. "The political Economy of WTO with special reference to NAMA Negotiations." The European Journal of Development Research 22 (2010): 175-196.

[21] Faye, Andrew A. "APEC and the New Regionalism: GATT Compliance and Prescriptions for the WTO." Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 28 (1996): 175.

[22] WTO, ‘WTO | Doha Declaration Explained’ (Wto.org2016) <https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/ dohaexplained_e.htm>.

[23] ‘WTO | Legal Texts - Marrakesh Agreement’ (Wto.org2019) <https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/26-gats_01_e.htm>.

[24] Hannan, Kate. "China's Trade Relations with US and the EU: WTO Membership, Free Markets (?), Agricultural Subsidies and Clothing, Textile and Footwear Qoutas." (2006).

[25] Thomas W Hertel and L. Alan Winters, ‘Poverty and the WTO : Impacts of the Doha Development Agenda’ [2006] World Bank Publications.

[26] Nurse, Keith. "Industrial policy, LDCs and the WTO regime." CDP Policy Review Series, United Nations, October (2016).

[27] Gay, Daniel, and Jodie Keane. "Least developed countries and the World Trade Organization: supporting graduation and reducing marginalisation in global trade." The Elgar Companion to the World Trade Organization (2023): 877-886.

[28] ‘Fernando de MATEO | FMG’ <https://fmg-geneva.org/fernando-de-mateo/> accessed 30 April 2024.

[29] Griller, Stefan, Walter Obwexer, and Erich Vranes, eds. Mega-regional trade agreements: CETA, TTIP, and TiSA: new orientations for EU external economic relations. Oxford University Press, 2017.

[30] Spinanger, Dean. The WTO after the Singapore ministerial: Much to do about what?. No. 304. Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge, 1997.

[31] Kerr, William A. "Singapore Issues." Handbook on the EU and International Trade (2018): 367-383.

[32] McKenzie, Lachlan, and Katharina L. Meissner. "EU–Singapore Negotiations: Overlapping Negotiations, Conflicting Interests?." A Geo-Economic Turn in Trade Policy? EU Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. 273-293.

[33] Kutlina-Dimitrova, Zornitsa, and Csilla Lakatos. "Assessing the economic impacts of the EU-Singapore FTA with a dynamic general equilibrium model." International Economics and Economic Policy 11 (2014): 277-291.

[34] Erixon, Fredrik. Containing creeping protectionism: A realist agenda for the G20. No. 1/2009. ECIPE Policy Brief, 2009.

[35] Ghibuţiu, Agnes. "Eu and the challenges of rising global protectionism." Romanian Economic and Business Review 12.1 (2017).

[36] Tietje, Christian, and Vinzenz Sacher. The new anti-dumping methodology of the European union: a breach of WTO law?. Springer International Publishing, 2018.

[37] Erixon, Fredrik, et al. "China's trade policy post-WTO accession: Focus on China–EU relations." The Future of Asian Trade and Growth. Routledge, 2009. 33-74.

[38] Viju-Miljusevic, Crina. "Protectionism and Global Recession: Has the Link Been Broken?." Journal of World Trade 45.3 (2011).

[39] Qin, Julia Ya. "The Predicament of China's “WTO-Plus” Obligation to Eliminate Export Duties: A Commentary on the China-Raw Materials Case." Chinese Journal of International Law 11.2 (2012): 237-246.

[40] ‘Press Corner’ (European Commission - European Commission) <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/ detail/en/IP_18_5786>.

[41] Li, Ke. "The Sino-Lithuanian Crisis and the EU’s Request for Consultations with China at the WTO." Chinese Journal of International Law 21.3 (2022): 631-635.

[42] García-Herrero, Alicia, et al. "EU–China Economic Relations to 2025." Building a Common Future, report by Chatham House, Bruegel, the China Center for International Economic Exchanges (CCIEE) and the Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Royal Institute of International Affairs (2017).

[43] Lamy, Pascal. "Former WTO Chief: How This Trade War Ends." New Persp. Q. 35 (2018): 27.

[44] TE VELDE, DIRK WILLEM. "to Address Aid for Trade." Aid for Trade and Development: 107.

[45] Mörth, Ulrika. "The EU as a normative power in the WTO." (2004).